Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5

John Stoffel
2001-12-04T16:32:24Z

Christoph> I still strongly object to it and I know lots of kernel
Christoph> hackers are the same opinion.

I'm not a hacker, but I think it's a good thing to move to CML2. I've
tested it and it's got some nice features. The Python issue I don't
think is too onerous to require of people. And wasn't there someone
out there porting CML2 to straight C code?

Why are people so wedded to the CML1 language spec anyway?

John
John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies
stoffel@lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-952-7548