From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 13:07:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C0F6D99.8CF24014@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF29EF801E.F851F18D-ON85256B19.00510775@raleigh.ibm.com> <20011206180353.E20583@in.ibm.com>
Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:02:33AM -0500, Niels Christiansen wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering about the scope of this. My Ethernet adapter with, maybe, 20
> > counter fields would have 20 counters allocated for each of my 16
> > processors.
> > The only way to get the total would be to use statctr_read() to merge them.
> > Same for the who knows how many IP counters etc., etc.
>
> Are you concerned with increase in memory used per counter Here? I suppose
> that must not be that much of an issue for a 16 processor box....
>
> >
> > How many and which counters were converted for the test you refer to?
> >
>
> Well, I wrote a simple kernel module which just increments a shared global
> counter a million times per processor in parallel, and compared it with
> the statctr which would be incremented a million times per processor in
> parallel..
Would you care to point out a statistic in the kernel that is
incremented
more than 10.000 times/second ? (I'm giving you a a factor of 100 of
playroom
here) [One that isn't per-cpu yet of course]
Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-06 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-05 15:02 [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Niels Christiansen
2001-12-06 12:33 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-06 12:59 ` Keith Owens
2001-12-06 13:07 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2001-12-06 14:09 ` [Lse-tech] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-06 14:10 ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-06 19:35 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-07 21:09 ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-12-07 21:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-06 16:10 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-07 8:54 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-08 22:24 ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-09 3:46 ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-09 4:44 ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-09 17:34 ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-11 23:27 ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-07 11:39 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-08 13:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-12-07 9:52 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-07 10:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-08 17:43 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-09 11:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-12-09 10:57 Manfred Spraul
2001-12-10 16:32 ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-10 17:00 ` Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C0F6D99.8CF24014@redhat.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=kiran@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox