public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 13:07:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C0F6D99.8CF24014@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF29EF801E.F851F18D-ON85256B19.00510775@raleigh.ibm.com> <20011206180353.E20583@in.ibm.com>

Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> 
> Hi Niels,
> 
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 10:02:33AM -0500, Niels Christiansen wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering about the scope of this.  My Ethernet adapter with, maybe, 20
> > counter fields would have 20 counters allocated for each of my 16
> > processors.
> > The only way to get the total would be to use statctr_read() to merge them.
> > Same for the who knows how many IP counters etc., etc.
> 
> Are you concerned with increase in memory used per counter Here? I suppose
> that must not be that much of an issue for a 16 processor box....
> 
> >
> > How many and which counters were converted for the test you refer to?
> >
> 
> Well, I wrote a simple kernel module which just increments a shared global
> counter a million times per processor in parallel, and compared it with
> the statctr which would be incremented a million times per processor in
> parallel..

Would you care to point out a statistic in the kernel that is
incremented 
more than 10.000 times/second ? (I'm giving you a a factor of 100 of
playroom 
here) [One that isn't per-cpu yet of course]

 
Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-12-06 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-12-05 15:02 [Lse-tech] [RFC] [PATCH] Scalable Statistics Counters Niels Christiansen
2001-12-06 12:33 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-06 12:59   ` Keith Owens
2001-12-06 13:07   ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2001-12-06 14:09     ` [Lse-tech] " Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-06 14:10       ` Arjan van de Ven
2001-12-06 19:35         ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-07 21:09     ` Alex Bligh - linux-kernel
2001-12-07 21:16       ` Arjan van de Ven
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-06 16:10 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-07  8:54 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-08 22:24   ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-09  3:46     ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-09  4:44       ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-09 17:34         ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-11 23:27           ` Paul Jackson
2001-12-07 11:39 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2001-12-08 13:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-12-07  9:52 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-07 10:10 ` Dipankar Sarma
2001-12-08 17:43 Niels Christiansen
2001-12-09 11:46 ` Anton Blanchard
2001-12-09 10:57 Manfred Spraul
2001-12-10 16:32 ` Jack Steiner
2001-12-10 17:00   ` Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C0F6D99.8CF24014@redhat.com \
    --to=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=kiran@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox