From: "Christopher Friesen" <cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com>
To: davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck)
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 17:14:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C113F33.B310CB10@nortelnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C103A1E.2524A7B7@zip.com.au> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0112071651360.22868-100000@freak.distro.conectiva> <15377.13976.342104.636304@napali.hpl.hp.com>
David Mosberger wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:52:07 -0200 (BRST), Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> said:
>
> Marcelo> I'm really not willing to apply this kludge...
>
> Do you agree that it should always be safe to call printk() from C code?
Is it really safe to call this from interrupt handlers? I can think of cases
where the time required to print can totally mess stuff up...
Chris
--
Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10
Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-07 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-03 5:46 [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processor initialization check) j-nomura
2001-12-03 9:20 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-03 10:32 ` j-nomura
2001-12-04 1:45 ` [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processor initializationcheck) Andrew Morton
2001-12-06 5:01 ` j-nomura
2001-12-07 3:40 ` [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck) Andrew Morton
2001-12-07 18:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-12-07 20:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2001-12-07 21:37 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-07 20:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-12-07 22:17 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-07 21:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-12-08 1:10 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-08 11:27 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-08 16:41 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-08 20:45 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-09 0:32 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-09 0:55 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-09 0:58 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-09 1:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-09 1:14 ` David Mosberger
2001-12-09 1:32 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-07 22:08 ` Alan Cox
2001-12-07 22:14 ` Christopher Friesen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-08 17:36 Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C113F33.B310CB10@nortelnetworks.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox