From: Andreas Haumer <andreas@xss.co.at>
To: "Gérard Roudier" <groudier@free.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, monika@xss.co.at
Subject: Re: Deadlock: Linux-2.2.18, sym53c8xx, Compaq ProLiant, HP Ultrium
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:40:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C21B21A.DF8110F2@xss.co.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011219191306.Y1668-100000@gerard>
Hi Gérard,
thanks for your reply!
Gérard Roudier wrote:
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Andreas Haumer wrote:
>
[...]
>
> > Dec 10 15:00:01 server kernel: st0: Error with sense data: Info
> > fld=0x8000, Current st09:00: sense key Hardware Error
> > Dec 10 15:00:01 server kernel: Additional sense indicates Internal
> > target failure
>
> This one is the result of a REQUEST SENSE performed due probably to a
> CHECK condition SCSI status reported by the device. It is not a SCSI
> transport problem. The device just reports an error to the application
> client. This is not a normal situation but happens very often.
>
Ok.
> > [...]
> >
> > After that, the amanda process hangs in state "D" and
> > cannot be killed anymore. The machine itself is still
> > working.
> > This _seems_ to be the indication of an error of the
> > HP Ultrium itself, though the drive works quite fine
> > otherwise...
>
> The 'D' states indicates that the process is waiting for something without
> being interruptible. This may be due to it not having been waken up on the
I knew that...
> IO error. The sym53c8xx driver did its work by performing the REQUEST
> SENSE, but something in upper layer seem not to complete the IO.
>
That's what I wasn't sure about...
[...]
>
> > b) Does the st0 error message indicate it should be replaced?
>
> Probably not. But it is very poor an information about the real issue.
>
I know, but I have the problem to decide how to proceed in this
situation...
> > c) Is there a bug in the sym53c8xx driver which makes the
> > amanda process hang uninterruptable when this error occurs?
>
> Not known. But possible, even if in my opinion, the driver is not at
> fault.
>
Ok.
[...]
>
> There are probably still bugs in the driver, but none are intentionnal,
> beleive me.
>
I honestly do believe you! :-)
> > The Ultrium hardware error is not reproducable at will. It
> > just happens every now and then.
> > Next thing I will try is to use a different SCSI controller
> > (Adaptec 29160 or the like) to see if the hanging process
> > occurs with a different SCSI driver, too.
>
> This is indeed something to try.
> I am very interested in the result.
>
The controller change is scheduled on December 28th.
We'll then see how it works in the next weeks/months.
I'll keep you (and LKML) informend...
Thank you.
- andreas
--
Andreas Haumer | mailto:andreas@xss.co.at
*x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/
Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0
A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-20 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-19 13:20 Deadlock: Linux-2.2.18, sym53c8xx, Compaq ProLiant, HP Ultrium Andreas Haumer
2001-12-19 18:34 ` Gérard Roudier
2001-12-20 9:40 ` Andreas Haumer [this message]
2001-12-20 19:24 ` Gérard Roudier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-19 23:24 Manfred Spraul
2001-12-20 9:47 ` Andreas Haumer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C21B21A.DF8110F2@xss.co.at \
--to=andreas@xss.co.at \
--cc=groudier@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=monika@xss.co.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox