From: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
To: Nathan Bryant <nbryant@allegientsystems.com>
Cc: saidani@info.unicaen.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TEST of patch proposed for i810 audio
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 00:35:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C2AB32F.2010905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C2A56C7.5050801@allegientsystems.com> <3C2A5F24.6090501@allegientsystems.com>
Nathan Bryant wrote:
> Nathan Bryant wrote:
>
>>
>> maybe this patch will solve your problem, samir, maybe it won't;
>> regardless, it should fix at least one corner case and is either
>> obviously correct or start_*c is not ;-)
>>
>> patch is against doug's 0.12.
>
>
> [snip]
>
> attached is a slightly more anal retentive version of my previous patch.
> as in the previous patch, the goal is to make update_lvi completely
> self-contained, ie resistant to changes in higher-level code, ie not
> deadlock even if somebody really sets it up with bad state, also
> eliminates one if/then/else thinko in 0.12 that could theoretically
> cause dac to be started when you're trying to record, which would cause
> a deadlock.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --- i810_audio.c.12 Wed Dec 19 02:04:06 2001
> +++ linux/drivers/sound/i810_audio.c Wed Dec 26 18:22:37 2001
> @@ -952,12 +952,16 @@
> * the CIV value to the next sg segment to be played so that when
> * we call start_{dac,adc}, things will operate properly
> */
> - if (!dmabuf->enable && dmabuf->trigger) {
> - if(rec && dmabuf->count != dmabuf->dmasize) {
> + if (!dmabuf->enable && dmabuf->ready) {
> + if(rec && dmabuf->count < dmabuf->dmasize &&
> + (dmabuf->trigger & PCM_ENABLE_INPUT))
> + {
> outb((inb(port+OFF_CIV)+1)&31, port+OFF_LVI);
> __start_adc(state);
> while( !(inb(port + OFF_CR) & ((1<<4) | (1<<2))) ) ;
> - } else if(dmabuf->count) {
> + } else if (!rec && dmabuf->count &&
> + (dmabuf->trigger & PCM_ENABLE_OUTPUT))
> + {
> outb((inb(port+OFF_CIV)+1)&31, port+OFF_LVI);
> __start_dac(state);
> while( !(inb(port + OFF_CR) & ((1<<4) | (1<<2))) ) ;
>
This looks fine to me. I've added it to my 0.12 driver, bumped the number
to 0.13, put it up on my web site
(http://people.redhat.com/dledford/i810_audio.c.gz) and if that solves
people's problems then that's what I'll send to Marcello in a day or so.
Thanks Nathan, I've been to busy to look into it the last little bit :-(
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com> http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Please check my web site for aic7xxx updates/answers before
e-mailing me about problems
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-27 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-26 23:01 [PATCH] TEST of patch proposed for i810 audio Nathan Bryant
2001-12-26 23:37 ` Nathan Bryant
2001-12-27 5:35 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-17 21:14 Samir Saidani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C2AB32F.2010905@redhat.com \
--to=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbryant@allegientsystems.com \
--cc=saidani@info.unicaen.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox