From: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@sirius-cafe.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks ...
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 10:45:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C2C3F55.3BA4A0C3@sirius-cafe.de> (raw)
> Re: [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks ...
>
> >
> > Right, that was my question. George says, in your words, "for better
>
> > standards compliancy ..." and I want to know why you guys think
> that.
>
> The thought was that if someone need RT tasks he probably need a very
> low
> latency and so the idea that by applying global preemption decisions
> would
> lead to a better compliancy. But i'll be happy to ear that this is
> false
> anyway ...
>
without wanting to start a RT flame-fest, what do people really want
when they talk about RT in this [Linux] context:
- very low latency
- deterministic latency ("never to exceed")
- both
- something completely different
Thanks
Martin
--
+-----------------------------------------------------+
|Martin Knoblauch |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
|http://www.knobisoft.de/cats |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
|e-mail: knobi@knobisoft.de |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
next reply other threads:[~2001-12-28 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-28 9:45 Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2001-12-29 9:12 ` [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks george anzinger
[not found] <200112291907.LAA25639@messenger.mvista.com>
2001-12-30 10:01 ` george anzinger
2001-12-30 19:54 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-12-31 13:56 ` george anzinger
2002-01-01 18:55 ` Dieter Nützel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-12-29 19:02 Dieter Nützel
2001-12-29 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2001-12-29 22:24 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-20 21:11 Davide Libenzi
2001-12-20 22:25 ` george anzinger
2001-12-20 22:21 ` Momchil Velikov
2001-12-20 22:57 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-21 17:00 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-12-21 17:19 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-21 17:33 ` Mike Kravetz
2001-12-21 18:29 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-24 0:18 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-24 1:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-24 5:33 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-24 18:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-27 3:01 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-27 17:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-28 0:05 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-28 0:48 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-20 22:36 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-24 0:19 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-24 1:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-12-27 3:42 ` Victor Yodaiken
2001-12-27 17:48 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C2C3F55.3BA4A0C3@sirius-cafe.de \
--to=knobi@sirius-cafe.de \
--cc=knobi@knobisoft.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox