public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "M. Edward Borasky" <znmeb@aracnet.com>,
	Art Hays <art@lsr.nei.nih.gov>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kswapd etc hogging machine
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 10:59:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C34AA0B.3D4B2891@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C33E8EA.FAF8E337@zip.com.au> from "Andrew Morton" at Jan 02, 2002 09:15:22 PM <E16M72b-0008B8-00@the-village.bc.nu>

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > But Art's kernel (what kernel is in RH7.2 anyway?  2.4.9 with vendor
> > hacks^Wfixes, I think) is nowhere near that stage.
> 
> 7.2 is 2.4.7-ac ish, 7.2 + errata is 2.4.9-ac ish

OK, thanks.

> > The good news is that 2.4.17 has pretty much slain this dragon.  The
> > -aa patches are better still, and 2.4.18 will be even better than
> > that.
> 
> Bollocks. I get regular mails from large numbers of people who are stuck
> at 2.4.12/13-ac and are hoping I'll do an update because their machines
> die in hours or run 25-50% slower with 2.4.1x.

I was referring to the swap and evict in the presence of heavy write
traffic.

> 2.4.1x VM code is performing better under light loads but its absolutely
> and completely hopeless under a real paging load. 2.4.17-aa is somewhat
> better interestingly.
> 

s/interestingly/frustratingly/.  -aa has some interesting changes to
the write scheduling as well.  I just wish I knew what problem they're
solving.

-

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-01-03 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-03  3:33 kswapd etc hogging machine Art Hays
2002-01-03  4:01 ` M. Edward Borasky
2002-01-03  4:13   ` Dave Jones
2002-01-03  5:15   ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-03  5:48     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-01-03  5:54       ` Jeffrey W. Baker
2002-01-03 12:32     ` Alan Cox
2002-01-03 16:51       ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 17:27         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-03 17:32           ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-03 23:42             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-03 18:59       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-01-04  7:06       ` Art Hays
2002-01-03 12:37 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C34AA0B.3D4B2891@zip.com.au \
    --to=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=art@lsr.nei.nih.gov \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=znmeb@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox