Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 7/7 v2] Re: PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h (part 1/7)

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>]

Andreas Dilger wrote:
> 
> On Jan 07, 2002  18:28 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > --- linux-fs6/fs/ext2/ext2_fs_i.h     Mon Sep 17 20:16:30 2001
> > +++ linux-fs7/fs/ext2/ext2_fs_i.h     Mon Jan  7 05:08:38 2002
> > @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@
> >       __u32   i_prealloc_count;
> >       __u32   i_dir_start_lookup;
> >       int     i_new_inode:1;  /* Is a freshly allocated inode */
> > +
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > +     struct inode i_inode_data;
> > +#endif
> >  };
> 
> Since ext2_fs_i.h only describes the in-memory data for ext2 inodes, there
> is no reason to #ifdef __KERNEL__ any changes therein.  I have seen several
> other people worry about changes to this file in the past also, and I was
> going to suggest adding a comment to the file, but I see it already says
> "inode data in memory" so I don't know what else to add...

If that is ok with everyone else, it's ok with me.  I just noticed that
ext2_fs_sb.h already uses kernel-specific types, adding weight to the
argument.

	Jeff



-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Alternate titles for LOTR:
Building 1024    | Fast Times at Uruk-Hai
MandrakeSoft     | The Took, the Elf, His Daughter and Her Lover
                 | Samwise Gamgee: International Hobbit of Mystery