Re: IDE Patch (fwd)

Andre Hedrick
2002-01-08T15:16:21Z

Greetings Matthew,

Thanks for the feedback, but lkml needs it or it will not be adopted.
I know the driver is stable and effectively perfect in operations.
So I do not understand the total ignore I receive about it.

respectfully

On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Matthew Hunter wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 01:15:38AM -0800, Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org> wrote:
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:17:00 -0500 (EST)
> > From: Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com>
> > To: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
> > Subject: IDE Patch
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm using your ide.2.4.16.12102001 patch with a Promise PDC20269
> > controller and a Maxtor 160GB hard drive on 2.4.17, and I just wanted to
> > tell you that it's working great so far.
> >
> > Thanks for all the great code,
> > Rob Radez
>
> Thought I would take the opportunity to ditto this
> privately. I'm using your IDE patch with 2.4.17, on a system
> with a three-drive RAID5 and a two-drive RAID0. I gained about 3
> mb/s on two drives individually. I haven't rebooted to compare
> raid performance (though I know it is faster -- just not by how
> much).
>
> It's been rock solid, no stability issues.
>
> Looks like great work.
>
> --
> Matthew Hunter (matthew@infodancer.org) Linux-2.4.17 on an i686
> GPG Public Key: http://www.infodancer.org/users/matthew/public.txt
> Fingerprint: 0CD5 FE63 0CB3 C996 7FFE 82F7 F9F5 A295 FA92 497C
> Thousands of years ago, cats were worshipped as gods. Cats have
> <never forgotten this.
>
>