From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: admin@nextframe.net
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/psi240i.c - io_request_lock fix
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 20:09:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C3B9853.740E71DA@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020108150738.B6168@sexything>
Morten Helgesen wrote:
>
> Hey Linus and the rest of you.
>
> A simple fix for the io_request_lock issue leftovers in drivers/scsi/psi240i.c.
> Not tested, but compiles. Diffed against 2.5.2-pre10. Please apply.
>
Morten,
There is a bit more involved than just switching
io_request_lock to host_lock. The former is global
so it could be called from anywhere.
>From the look of this line in the patch:
> + struct Scsi_Host *host = PsiHost[irq - 10];
It will work if the first controller is allocated irq 10,
the second one irq 11, etc. Unlikely ...
Looking at that driver it seems that it will need a
bit of surgery to pass perhaps a Scsi_Cmnd pointer
through the request_irq() function so you can
follow a pointer chain in do_Irq_Handler() to get
hold of the appropriate host_lock.
In the lk 2.5 series host_lock should indeed be held
when the callback "scsi_done" is invoked and that
most likely occurs in Irq_Handler(). So that is right.
BTW To get a better idea of what is involved, diff the
sym53c8xx driver in lk 2.4.15 and the one in the
lk 2.5 series now [kudos to Gerard Roudier].
Having been burnt by a well meaning advansys patch that
converted a kernel compile time error into a kernel
boot time freeze, it is a bit worrying the number
of "untested" patches of this nature appearing on lkml.
Doug Gilbert
> --- vanilla-linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/scsi/psi240i.c Tue Jan 8 10:57:31 2002
> +++ patched-linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/scsi/psi240i.c Tue Jan 8 14:48:56 2002
> @@ -370,10 +370,11 @@
> static void do_Irq_Handler (int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> + struct Scsi_Host *host = PsiHost[irq - 10];
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&io_request_lock, flags);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&host->host_lock, flags);
> Irq_Handler(irq, dev_id, regs);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->host_lock, flags);
> }
> /****************************************************************
> * Name: Psi240i_QueueCommand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-08 14:07 [PATCH] drivers/scsi/psi240i.c - io_request_lock fix Morten Helgesen
2002-01-09 1:09 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2002-01-09 10:46 ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-09 11:07 ` Morten Helgesen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-09 13:28 Adam J. Richter
2002-01-09 13:52 ` Morten Helgesen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C3B9853.740E71DA@torque.net \
--to=dougg@torque.net \
--cc=admin@nextframe.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox