public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Douglas Gilbert <dougg@torque.net>
To: admin@nextframe.net
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/scsi/psi240i.c - io_request_lock fix
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 20:09:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C3B9853.740E71DA@torque.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020108150738.B6168@sexything>

Morten Helgesen wrote:
> 
> Hey Linus and the rest of you.
> 
> A simple fix for the io_request_lock issue leftovers in drivers/scsi/psi240i.c.
> Not tested, but compiles. Diffed against 2.5.2-pre10. Please apply.
> 

Morten,
There is a bit more involved than just switching
io_request_lock to host_lock. The former is global
so it could be called from anywhere.

>From the look of this line in the patch:
> +       struct Scsi_Host *host = PsiHost[irq - 10];

It will work if the first controller is allocated irq 10,
the second one irq 11, etc.   Unlikely ...

Looking at that driver it seems that it will need a
bit of surgery to pass perhaps a Scsi_Cmnd pointer
through the request_irq() function so you can
follow a pointer chain in do_Irq_Handler() to get
hold of the appropriate host_lock.

In the lk 2.5 series host_lock should indeed be held
when the callback "scsi_done" is invoked and that
most likely occurs in Irq_Handler(). So that is right.

BTW To get a better idea of what is involved, diff the
sym53c8xx driver in lk 2.4.15 and the one in the
lk 2.5 series now [kudos to Gerard Roudier].


Having been burnt by a well meaning advansys patch that
converted a kernel compile time error into a kernel
boot time freeze, it is a bit worrying the number
of "untested" patches of this nature appearing on lkml.

Doug Gilbert


> --- vanilla-linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/scsi/psi240i.c    Tue Jan  8 10:57:31 2002
> +++ patched-linux-2.5.2-pre10/drivers/scsi/psi240i.c    Tue Jan  8 14:48:56 2002
> @@ -370,10 +370,11 @@
>  static void do_Irq_Handler (int irq, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
>         {
>         unsigned long flags;
> +       struct Scsi_Host *host = PsiHost[irq - 10];
> 
> -       spin_lock_irqsave(&io_request_lock, flags);
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&host->host_lock, flags);
>         Irq_Handler(irq, dev_id, regs);
> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&io_request_lock, flags);
> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->host_lock, flags);
>         }
>  /****************************************************************
>   *     Name:   Psi240i_QueueCommand

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-09  1:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-08 14:07 [PATCH] drivers/scsi/psi240i.c - io_request_lock fix Morten Helgesen
2002-01-09  1:09 ` Douglas Gilbert [this message]
2002-01-09 10:46   ` Jens Axboe
2002-01-09 11:07     ` Morten Helgesen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-09 13:28 Adam J. Richter
2002-01-09 13:52 ` Morten Helgesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C3B9853.740E71DA@torque.net \
    --to=dougg@torque.net \
    --cc=admin@nextframe.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox