* Strange: load=stable, running idle=unstable
@ 2002-01-11 0:39 Michael Klose
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Michael Klose @ 2002-01-11 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi,
I recently had problems with 2 eepro100 cards in my system. I could
crash the kernel (only reboot helped) if I copied a 700 MB file to the
server. It crashed after 100 MB or so.
I experimented a bit with the intel eepro drivers, the kernel drivers as
a loadable module, compiled in etc, but it all didn't make much difference.
I had the most problems with 2.4.17 (vanilla). The most stable kernel
seemed to be 2.4.15pre5.
I found out that the kernel stays absolutely stable if it is under load.
I first tried compiling a kernel non stop for 3 days in a loop. System
was absolutely stable.
I switched from non-stop compiling to running setiathome. Also makes the
kernel run beautifully.
But as soon as the kenel is doing nothing except light routing of the
768/128kbit DSL into the 100 MBit LAN and mainly running idle, as soon
as you try and copy a large file via SMB - kaboom - kernel crashes.
Hardware: Soyo BX Dual PII motherboard with a single PII 266. 2 IDE HDDs
(Maxtor) and a ATI PCI graphics card (no framebuffer or so compiled in,
and no X, it is a server). SMB support is not compiled in, neither is
any form of power management.
I thought this may be interesting to some people.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-01-11 0:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-11 0:39 Strange: load=stable, running idle=unstable Michael Klose
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox