Re: [Q] Looking for an emulation for CMOV* instructions.

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@transmeta.com>]

Adam J. Richter wrote:

> 
> 	Your comment prompted me to look at
> linux-2.5.2-pre11/include/asm-i386/spinlock.h, and I now believe that
> the "lock; decb" that it uses for grabbing spinlocks will return an
> incorrect success if 255 or more processors are waiting on the same
> spinlock.  I don't know if anybody has ever built a shared memory x86
> multiprocessor with 257 (not a typo) or more CPU's, but it's possible
> to imagine.  It's also possible to imagine this scenario happening
> with even just one processor and a preemtable kernel.  I believe that
> the current preemtable kernel patch limits the number of preempted
> processes to something like four or six, but that's just a temporary
> limitation of the current version.
> 


Linux specificially does not allow for more processors than there are 
bits in a long (32 or 64).  Libc, however, since it counts processes, 
not CPUs, uses a 4-byte word.

	-hpa