From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:48:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:46:08 -0500 Received: from cx97923-a.phnx3.az.home.com ([24.1.197.194]:28082 "EHLO grok.yi.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Jan 2002 11:45:17 -0500 Message-ID: <3C4309EC.3090805@candelatech.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 09:40:12 -0700 From: Ben Greear Organization: Candela Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David S. Miller" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Multi-packet read/write for packet sockets? In-Reply-To: <3C430323.6060707@candelatech.com> <20020114.082621.105170691.davem@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Excellent... Does anyone have a snippet of code that shows how this works? David S. Miller wrote: > Use mmap() on packet sockets... it is even faster than the > thing which you propose. > > -- Ben Greear President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear