public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: likely/unlikely
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 04:12:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C4543F0.29CCD025@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C450C4A.8A8382A6@mandrakesoft.com> <20020116060014.GB24266@krispykreme>

Anton Blanchard wrote:
> 
> 
> > likely/unlikely set the branch prediction values to 99% or 1%
> > respectively.  If this causes the code generated to perform less
> > optimally than without, I'm sure the gcc guys would be -very- interested
> > to hear that...
> 
> On some ppc64 the branch prediction is quite good and static prediction
> will override the dynamic prediction. I think we avoid predicting a
> branch unless we are quite sure (95%/5%).
> 
> So if likely/unlikely is overused (on more marginal conditionals) then
> it could be a performance loss.

oh agreed... but marginal conditionals should not be getting
likely()/unlikely() as you are then lying to the compiler about the true
branch predictability...

	Jeff


-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Alternate titles for LOTR:
Building 1024    | Fast Times at Uruk-Hai
MandrakeSoft     | The Took, the Elf, His Daughter and Her Lover
                 | Samwise Gamgee: International Hobbit of Mystery

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-16  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-16  3:22 likely/unlikely David Schwartz
2002-01-16  5:14 ` likely/unlikely Jeff Garzik
2002-01-16  6:00   ` likely/unlikely Anton Blanchard
2002-01-16  9:12     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-01-16  6:32   ` likely/unlikely Craig Christophel
2002-01-16  7:38     ` likely/unlikely Adrian Bunk
2002-01-16  9:14     ` likely/unlikely Jeff Garzik
2002-01-16  9:29       ` likely/unlikely Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C4543F0.29CCD025@mandrakesoft.com \
    --to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=davids@webmaster.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox