public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Klaus Meyer <k.meyer@m3its.de>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: highmem=system killer, 2.2.17=performance killer ?
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:34:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C48325A.EFFA4237@m3its.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1020117235335.5060B-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>

Bill Davidsen wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Klaus Meyer wrote:
> 
> > It was just a bad memory modul. Believe me, i'd tested them before
> > carefully.
> > But i had to learn that even ECC-modules installed in brand motherboards
> > dont tell you that they are not working correctly.
> 
> I wonder if your BIOS is doing the right thing setting the ECC config?
> That should have been reported.
> 

Yes you are right. That _should_ have been reported.
I'm using the ASUS CUR-DLS with the ServerSet LE III chipset.
I was honestly convinced that such a motherboard is constructed for
server usage and stability. Perhaps there is something wrong with my
board.
Since you have to use ECC modules in this motherboard there is
no way to configure a special ECC config mode in the bios.

The bad module (1 GB) was installed in bank 1 beside another GB module
in bank 0.
The board reported 2GB of installed ram.
I put it then in bank 0 as the only module installed.
The bios then reported 16M as mem, which is wrong of course, but: no
error.
It's really funny since all memory tests with 16M were sucessful (using
memtest).
After that the board always reported 16M not depending on the bank
position _without any error_.

I really don't know wether I should laugh or cry about that ;)
All in all the system is now working stable with other modules (2x1GB)
installed.

regards
	Klaus

  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-18 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-15  3:13 highmem=system killer, 2.2.17=performance killer ? Klaus Meyer
2002-01-15 15:00 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-15 16:42   ` Klaus Meyer
2002-01-15 16:49     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-18  2:04       ` Klaus Meyer
2002-01-18  4:56         ` Bill Davidsen
2002-01-18 14:34           ` Klaus Meyer [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-15 14:46 rwhron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C48325A.EFFA4237@m3its.de \
    --to=k.meyer@m3its.de \
    --cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox