From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:32:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:32:34 -0500 Received: from [212.50.10.141] ([212.50.10.141]:15582 "HELO ns.top.bg") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:32:22 -0500 Message-ID: <3C4CDD8A.D619815A@top.bg> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 19:33:30 -0800 From: Anton Tinchev X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: costefl@wanadoo.fr Subject: Re: Re : Sharing Interrupt+HPT366 Problem on BP6 In-Reply-To: <3C4C5022.EEEAEF3@gemplus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I use Software RAID level 5 Florent Coste wrote: > Look at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~b6506063/hpt366/ "both HPT366 > channels share the same IRQ, so you might want to try that suppose you > are tight on high IRQs" > > I'have a BP6 too, and i'm about to use the HPT366 (bought a fast drive), > and i have a question : > do you use Software RAID (provided by the kernel ?) > > Or HPT366 to HPT368 bios flashing wich make RAID 0,1 available ? > (as explained in http://www.tweakhardware.com/guide/hpt366/ ) > > But let me be clear : i don't know if it works on the HPT366 provided on > the BP6 since the previous article speaks about off board hpt366 > controllers. > > Florent