From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:06:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C553EE3.4060202@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020126171545.GB11344@fefe.de> <3C542FE6.7C56D6BD@mandrakesoft.com> <3C5439C1.6000305@evision-ventures.com> <3C543E86.7F0FA37A@gmx.net> <a31q91$upd$1@nell.transmeta.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Followup to: <3C543E86.7F0FA37A@gmx.net>
>By author: root <gunther.mayer@gmx.net>
>In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
>>You don't need a hub to have collisions.
>>
>>Duplex mismatch (i.e. one card in full-duplex, the other in half-duplex)
>>would just show 10-50 KByte/sec transfer rates typically.
>>
>>The card's statistics about "collisions" and "late collisions" would
>>positively prove if this is the case.
>>
>
>Not all cards correctly autoconfigure across a crossover cable (they
>should, but not all do). When autoconfigure is screwed up, as you
>indicate above, things will be *VERY* messed up.
>
Well boys, I know about the ifconfig command, and I just don't see
anything special there.
In esp. no collision indications. I would rather suspect, that there are
maybe some IRQ sharing
problems with the driver, since this got changed as well. However I
simple just didn't
have the time to narrow it down to this. (In esp. doing a recompile with
just the blah_irq -> blash_irqsave
changes enabled.
>
>
> -hpa
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-28 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-26 17:15 question about sparc 64-bit user land Felix von Leitner
2002-01-26 17:24 ` Ben Collins
2002-01-26 17:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 14:11 ` CRAP in 2.4.18-pre7 Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 16:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-01-27 17:32 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-01-27 17:53 ` root
2002-01-27 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-28 12:06 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-01-28 15:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-27 18:46 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-27 21:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-28 3:40 ` Michal Jaegermann
2002-01-26 18:07 ` question about sparc 64-bit user land Andreas Jaeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C553EE3.4060202@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox