public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Werner Almesberger <wa@almesberger.net>,
	"Erik A. Hendriks" <hendriks@lanl.gov>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86 ELF bootable kernels/Linux booting Linux/LinuxBIOS
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:41:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C58CAE0.4040102@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1elk7d37d.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>	<3C586355.A396525B@zip.com.au> <m1zo2vb5rt.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>	<3C58B078.3070803@zytor.com> <m1vgdjb0x0.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>

Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> 
> I am reluctant to go with a bootimg like interface because having a
> standard format encourages people to standardize.  Though a good
> argument can persuade me.  I don't loose any flexibility in comparison
> to bootimg because composing files on the fly is not significantly
> harder than composing a bootable image in ram. 
> 
> Please tell me if I haven't clearly answered your concerns about
> being locked into a single image.
> 


I have to think about it.  I'm not convinced that this particular 
flavour of standardization is a step in the right direction -- in fact, 
it is *guaranteed* to provide significant additional complexity for 
bootloaders, and bzImage support is still going to have to be provided 
for the forseeable future.  Since you express that it will basically be 
necessary to stitch the ELF file together on the fly I don't see much 
point, quite frankly; it seems like extra complexity for no good reason.

	-hpa



  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-31  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-30 19:54 [RFC] x86 ELF bootable kernels/Linux booting Linux/LinuxBIOS Eric W. Biederman
2002-01-30 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2002-01-30 23:52   ` Keith Owens
2002-01-31  2:42   ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-01-31  2:48     ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-31  4:27       ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-01-31  4:41         ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2002-01-31  5:15           ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-01-31  5:59             ` H. Peter Anvin
     [not found]               ` <m1n0yvaucy.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
2002-01-31 17:57                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-31 22:34                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-01-31 22:52                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-01  7:52                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-01-31 17:35           ` Erik A. Hendriks
2002-01-31 23:36             ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-01  0:03               ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-01  9:03                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-01  9:25                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-01 15:42                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-01 18:26                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-02 16:17                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-02 21:06                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-02 23:02                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-03  1:56                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-03 18:43                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-03 19:39                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-03 22:18                                     ` Rob Landley
2002-02-03 22:24                                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-03 22:59                                         ` Rob Landley
2002-02-03 23:01                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-03 23:47                                             ` Rob Landley
2002-02-04  1:34                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-04  9:53                                             ` Marco Colombo
2002-02-04 16:19                                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-04 19:55                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-04 20:51                                       ` Alan Cox
2002-02-04 20:40                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-03 19:48                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-04 20:16                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-04  4:29                                   ` Keith Owens
2002-02-04 20:01                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-04 12:49                         ` Werner Almesberger
2002-02-04 16:26                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-04 19:45                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-04 21:02                             ` Werner Almesberger
2002-02-04 21:08                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-05  7:45                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-02-01  0:46               ` Keith Owens
2002-01-31  3:03     ` Keith Owens
2002-02-01  7:22       ` Greg KH
2002-01-30 21:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-01-31  2:31   ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C58CAE0.4040102@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hendriks@lanl.gov \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wa@almesberger.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox