* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)
@ 2002-01-22 8:51 Robbert Kouprie
2002-01-22 14:53 ` James Bourne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-22 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jussi.laako; +Cc: linux-kernel
Jussi Laako wrote:
> Robbert Kouprie wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the quick reply :) Just checked it, and it's in slot 2, so
> > that's not the problem. It doesn't share the HPT366 IRQ. This is my
> > /proc/interrupts:
>
> Driver is eepro100? I suspect there is something in eepro100 driver that
> should be protected by a spinlock but is not. I haven't got time to
> analyze it further, yet...
>
> - Jussi Laako
Yes, eepro100.c. Let me know if I can test something, although I would
need a reproducible testcase also. Still doing some tests with high
network load, as this caused the similar lockup in the other thread.
- Robbert
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-22 8:51 NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-22 14:53 ` James Bourne 2002-01-30 19:29 ` Robbert Kouprie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: James Bourne @ 2002-01-22 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robbert Kouprie; +Cc: jussi.laako, linux-kernel On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Robbert Kouprie wrote: > > Jussi Laako wrote: > > > Robbert Kouprie wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the quick reply :) Just checked it, and it's in slot 2, so > > > that's not the problem. It doesn't share the HPT366 IRQ. This is my > > > /proc/interrupts: > > > > Driver is eepro100? I suspect there is something in eepro100 driver that > > should be protected by a spinlock but is not. I haven't got time to > > analyze it further, yet... > > > > - Jussi Laako > > Yes, eepro100.c. Let me know if I can test something, although I would > need a reproducible testcase also. Still doing some tests with high > network load, as this caused the similar lockup in the other thread. > > - Robbert > Perhaps this will help. Yesterday we had a strange error on an eepro100 NIC. System is 4-way Xeon, 4G RAM, 4 eepro100 nics (2 in use), Dell PE6400. Kernel is 2.4.17, no additional patches. The system has not locked up though. The error was eth0: can't fill rx buffer (force 0)! eth0: Tx ring dump, Tx queue 3013060 / 3013060: eth0: 0 200ca000. eth0: 1 000ca000. eth0: 2 000ca000. eth0: 3 400ca000. eth0: *= 4 000ca000. eth0: 5 000ca000. [... all the same ...] eth0: 30 000ca000. eth0: 31 000ca000. eth0: Printing Rx ring (next to receive into 2522947, dirty index 2522946). eth0: 0 00000001. eth0: l 1 c0000001. eth0: * 2 00000000. eth0: = 3 00000001. eth0: 4 00000001. eth0: 5 00000001. [... all the same ...] eth0: 30 00000001. eth0: 31 00000001. System has only 4 days uptime, eth0 output is: UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3049032 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:3566542 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:580129470 (553.2 Mb) TX bytes:2775810991 (2647.2 Mb) Interrupt:26 /proc/interrupts loki:bash# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0: 10332192 10317829 10310969 10381268 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 292 307 250 273 IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 0 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 26 32 30 27 IO-APIC-edge rtc 17: 6 4 3 3 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx 18: 2 5 2 7 IO-APIC-level aic7xxx 22: 766030 765530 764892 765127 IO-APIC-level eth1 23: 388900 388509 388022 388376 IO-APIC-level megaraid 26: 1395108 1395240 1394961 1396555 IO-APIC-level eth0 NMI: 0 0 0 0 LOC: 41347538 41347536 41347536 41347494 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 lspci loki:bash# lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE Host Bridge (rev 21) 00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE Host Bridge (rev 01) 00:00.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0006 00:00.3 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0006 00:04.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage IIC (rev 7a) 00:05.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec 7899P (rev 01) 00:05.1 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec 7899P (rev 01) 00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) 00:0f.0 ISA bridge: ServerWorks OSB4 South Bridge (rev 50) 00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks OSB4 IDE Controller 00:0f.2 USB Controller: ServerWorks OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 04) 03:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) 03:09.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21154 (rev 05) 03:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) 03:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) 04:00.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21154 (rev 05) 04:01.0 SCSI storage controller: Q Logic QLA12160 (rev 06) 05:00.0 RAID bus controller: American Megatrends Inc. MegaRAID (rev 20) Although I haven't had much time to track this yet (was planning later today) I thought it might be related to the above... If any other information would help, please let me know. Regards James Bourne -- James Bourne, Supervisor Data Centre Operations Mount Royal College, Calgary, AB, CA www.mtroyal.ab.ca ****************************************************************************** This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged information. Please contact the sender immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. ****************************************************************************** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* RE: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-22 14:53 ` James Bourne @ 2002-01-30 19:29 ` Robbert Kouprie 2002-01-30 21:06 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-30 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Not much new, but still: Today I got the same problem again with 2.4.18-pre3-ac2. Network connections stuck, NFS mounts stuck. Bringing down/up the interface doesn't help. Seems like the NIC is really in trouble here. Only a reboot would bring the nick back in use. Still no testcase though, and I have no idea on how to investigate this :( Can anyone give a hint as where to seek? Regards, - Robbert Kouprie > -----Original Message----- > From: James Bourne [mailto:jbourne@MtRoyal.AB.CA] > Sent: dinsdag 22 januari 2002 15:54 > To: Robbert Kouprie > Cc: jussi.laako@kolumbus.fi; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Robbert Kouprie wrote: > > > > > Jussi Laako wrote: > > > > > Robbert Kouprie wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick reply :) Just checked it, and it's > in slot 2, so > > > > that's not the problem. It doesn't share the HPT366 > IRQ. This is my > > > > /proc/interrupts: > > > > > > Driver is eepro100? I suspect there is something in > eepro100 driver that > > > should be protected by a spinlock but is not. I haven't > got time to > > > analyze it further, yet... > > > > > > - Jussi Laako > > > > Yes, eepro100.c. Let me know if I can test something, > although I would > > need a reproducible testcase also. Still doing some tests with high > > network load, as this caused the similar lockup in the other thread. > > > > - Robbert > > > > Perhaps this will help. Yesterday we had a strange error on > an eepro100 > NIC. System is 4-way Xeon, 4G RAM, 4 eepro100 nics (2 in > use), Dell PE6400. > Kernel is 2.4.17, no additional patches. The system has not locked up > though. > > The error was > eth0: can't fill rx buffer (force 0)! > eth0: Tx ring dump, Tx queue 3013060 / 3013060: > eth0: 0 200ca000. > eth0: 1 000ca000. > eth0: 2 000ca000. > eth0: 3 400ca000. > eth0: *= 4 000ca000. > eth0: 5 000ca000. > [... all the same ...] > eth0: 30 000ca000. > eth0: 31 000ca000. > eth0: Printing Rx ring (next to receive into 2522947, dirty > index 2522946). > eth0: 0 00000001. > eth0: l 1 c0000001. > eth0: * 2 00000000. > eth0: = 3 00000001. > eth0: 4 00000001. > eth0: 5 00000001. > [... all the same ...] > eth0: 30 00000001. > eth0: 31 00000001. > > System has only 4 days uptime, eth0 output is: > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:3049032 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:3566542 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 > RX bytes:580129470 (553.2 Mb) TX bytes:2775810991 > (2647.2 Mb) > Interrupt:26 > > /proc/interrupts > loki:bash# cat /proc/interrupts > CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 > 0: 10332192 10317829 10310969 10381268 > IO-APIC-edge timer > 1: 292 307 250 273 > IO-APIC-edge keyboard > 2: 0 0 0 0 > XT-PIC cascade > 8: 26 32 30 27 IO-APIC-edge rtc > 17: 6 4 3 3 > IO-APIC-level aic7xxx > 18: 2 5 2 7 > IO-APIC-level aic7xxx > 22: 766030 765530 764892 765127 IO-APIC-level eth1 > 23: 388900 388509 388022 388376 > IO-APIC-level megaraid > 26: 1395108 1395240 1394961 1396555 IO-APIC-level eth0 > NMI: 0 0 0 0 > LOC: 41347538 41347536 41347536 41347494 > ERR: 0 > MIS: 0 > > lspci > loki:bash# lspci > 00:00.0 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE Host Bridge (rev 21) > 00:00.1 Host bridge: ServerWorks CNB20HE Host Bridge (rev 01) > 00:00.2 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0006 > 00:00.3 Host bridge: ServerWorks: Unknown device 0006 > 00:04.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D > Rage IIC (rev 7a) > 00:05.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec 7899P (rev 01) > 00:05.1 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec 7899P (rev 01) > 00:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 > [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) > 00:0f.0 ISA bridge: ServerWorks OSB4 South Bridge (rev 50) > 00:0f.1 IDE interface: ServerWorks OSB4 IDE Controller > 00:0f.2 USB Controller: ServerWorks OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB > Controller (rev 04) > 03:08.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 > [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) > 03:09.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip > 21154 (rev 05) > 03:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 > [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) > 03:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 > [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 08) > 04:00.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip > 21154 (rev 05) > 04:01.0 SCSI storage controller: Q Logic QLA12160 (rev 06) > 05:00.0 RAID bus controller: American Megatrends Inc. > MegaRAID (rev 20) > > > Although I haven't had much time to track this yet (was planning later > today) I thought it might be related to the above... If any other > information would help, please let me know. > > Regards > James Bourne > > -- > James Bourne, Supervisor Data Centre Operations > Mount Royal College, Calgary, AB, CA > www.mtroyal.ab.ca > > ************************************************************** > **************** > This communication is intended for the use of the recipient > to which it is > addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged > information. Please contact the sender immediately if you are not the > intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, > distribute, or > take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or > subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed. > ************************************************************** > **************** > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-30 19:29 ` Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-30 21:06 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 2002-01-31 0:27 ` Robbert Kouprie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Stephan von Krawczynski @ 2002-01-30 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robbert Kouprie; +Cc: linux-kernel On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:29:15 +0100 "Robbert Kouprie" <robbert@jvb.tudelft.nl> wrote: > Not much new, but still: > > Today I got the same problem again with 2.4.18-pre3-ac2. Network > connections stuck, NFS mounts stuck. Bringing down/up the interface > doesn't help. Seems like the NIC is really in trouble here. Only a > reboot would bring the nick back in use. > > Still no testcase though, and I have no idea on how to investigate this > :( > Can anyone give a hint as where to seek? How about www.kernel.org? Download _latest_ kernel-patch (-pre7) and tell us about it. As long as you are trying only old pre's there is not much of a chance any important brain will listen to you. Regards, Stephan (no important brain) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* RE: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-30 21:06 ` Stephan von Krawczynski @ 2002-01-31 0:27 ` Robbert Kouprie 2002-01-31 12:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-31 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Stephan von Krawczynski'; +Cc: linux-kernel Thanks for your reaction Stephan, but I seriously doubt the change below would fix the problem... Also, as the problem appears randomly, and usually after some uptime, I obviously can not know about it being fixed if I constantly upgrade the kernel. I'd rather wait and see if it appears again in time after I did a kernel upgrade, and not trying every -pre while there's no mention on the mailing list of such bug being fixed. Anyway, I just rebooted with 2.4.18-pre7-ac1, we'll see if it helps. Regards, - Robbert radium:/usr/src# diff -u linux.18p3-ac2/drivers/net/eepro100.c linux.18p7-ac1/drivers/net/eepro100.c --- linux.18p3-ac2/drivers/net/eepro100.c Fri Dec 21 18:41:54 2001 +++ linux.18p7-ac1/drivers/net/eepro100.c Thu Jan 31 00:35:56 2002 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ */ static const char *version = -"eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/eepro100.html\n" +"eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://www.scyld.com/network/eepro100.html\n" "eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg> and others\n"; /* A few user-configurable values that apply to all boards. > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephan von Krawczynski [mailto:skraw@ithnet.com] > Sent: woensdag 30 januari 2002 22:07 > To: Robbert Kouprie > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 20:29:15 +0100 > "Robbert Kouprie" <robbert@jvb.tudelft.nl> wrote: > > > Not much new, but still: > > > > Today I got the same problem again with 2.4.18-pre3-ac2. Network > > connections stuck, NFS mounts stuck. Bringing down/up the interface > > doesn't help. Seems like the NIC is really in trouble here. Only a > > reboot would bring the nick back in use. > > > > Still no testcase though, and I have no idea on how to > investigate this > > :( > > Can anyone give a hint as where to seek? > > How about www.kernel.org? Download _latest_ kernel-patch > (-pre7) and tell us > about it. As long as you are trying only old pre's there is > not much of > a chance any important brain will listen to you. > > Regards, > Stephan > (no important brain) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-31 0:27 ` Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-31 12:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski 2002-01-31 16:32 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Stephan von Krawczynski @ 2002-01-31 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robbert Kouprie; +Cc: linux-kernel On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 01:27:47 +0100 "Robbert Kouprie" <robbert@jvb.tudelft.nl> wrote: > Thanks for your reaction Stephan, but I seriously doubt the change below > would fix the problem... Also, as the problem appears randomly, and > usually after some uptime, I obviously can not know about it being fixed > if I constantly upgrade the kernel. I'd rather wait and see if it > appears again in time after I did a kernel upgrade, and not trying every > -pre while there's no mention on the mailing list of such bug being > fixed. > > Anyway, I just rebooted with 2.4.18-pre7-ac1, we'll see if it helps. Hello Robert, Well, I know the changes to the driver are rather ... small :-) But on the other hand, I would not be all that sure that the bug is a hundred percent related to the driver itself. I run a working config with eepro100-driver, btw. Regards, Stephan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-31 12:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski @ 2002-01-31 16:32 ` Ben Greear 2002-01-31 16:52 ` Robbert Kouprie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2002-01-31 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephan von Krawczynski; +Cc: Robbert Kouprie, linux-kernel What does the rest of the hardware-config look like? Is the NIC attached to a 10bt hub? Are you using PCI-Riser cards? Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 01:27:47 +0100 > "Robbert Kouprie" <robbert@jvb.tudelft.nl> wrote: > > >>Thanks for your reaction Stephan, but I seriously doubt the change below >>would fix the problem... Also, as the problem appears randomly, and >>usually after some uptime, I obviously can not know about it being fixed >>if I constantly upgrade the kernel. I'd rather wait and see if it >>appears again in time after I did a kernel upgrade, and not trying every >>-pre while there's no mention on the mailing list of such bug being >>fixed. >> >>Anyway, I just rebooted with 2.4.18-pre7-ac1, we'll see if it helps. >> > > Hello Robert, > > Well, I know the changes to the driver are rather ... small :-) > But on the other hand, I would not be all that sure that the bug is a > hundred percent related to the driver itself. > I run a working config with eepro100-driver, btw. > > Regards, > Stephan > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-31 16:32 ` Ben Greear @ 2002-01-31 16:52 ` Robbert Kouprie 2002-01-31 17:54 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-31 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear; +Cc: linux-kernel The box is an Abit BP6 with Dual Celerons 433 and 192 Mb RAM. No PCI-Riser cards. It is connected at 100 Mbit full duplex to a 100 Mbit switch. APIC is enabled. No kind of power management is enabled. Below is my /proc/interrupts, lspci -vx and dmesg output. Regards, - Robbert radium:/# cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 2944301 2940065 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 39 41 IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 3074 3208 IO-APIC-edge serial 8: 2 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 14: 20 29 IO-APIC-edge ide0 17: 627932 628166 IO-APIC-level eth0 18: 121201 121973 IO-APIC-level ide2 19: 522304 521928 IO-APIC-level es1371 NMI: 0 0 LOC: 5884708 5884706 ERR: 170 MIS: 0 radium:/# lspci -vx 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (rev 03) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32 Memory at d0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M] Capabilities: [a0] AGP version 1.0 00: 86 80 90 71 06 00 10 22 03 00 00 06 00 20 00 00 10: 08 00 00 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX AGP bridge (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode]) Flags: bus master, 66Mhz, medium devsel, latency 64 Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=32 Memory behind bridge: d4000000-d7ffffff Prefetchable memory behind bridge: d8000000-d8ffffff 00: 86 80 91 71 07 01 20 02 03 00 04 06 00 40 01 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 20 f0 00 a0 22 20: 00 d4 f0 d7 00 d8 f0 d8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 88 00 00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0 00: 86 80 10 71 0f 00 80 02 02 00 01 06 00 00 80 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) (prog-if 80 [Master]) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32 I/O ports at f000 [size=16] 00: 86 80 11 71 05 00 80 02 01 80 01 01 00 20 00 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 01 f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [UHCI]) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 19 I/O ports at c000 [size=32] 00: 86 80 12 71 05 00 80 02 01 00 03 0c 00 20 00 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 01 c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 04 00 00 00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02) Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 9 00: 86 80 13 71 03 00 80 02 02 00 80 06 00 00 00 00 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00:09.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] (rev 06) Subsystem: Ensoniq Creative Sound Blaster AudioPCI64V, AudioPCI128 Flags: bus master, slow devsel, latency 32, IRQ 19 I/O ports at c400 [size=64] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1 00: 74 12 71 13 05 01 10 34 06 00 01 04 00 20 00 00 10: 01 c4 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 74 12 71 13 30: 00 00 00 00 dc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0c 01 0c 80 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 09) Subsystem: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 0011 Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 17 Memory at da020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] I/O ports at c800 [size=64] Memory at da000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K] Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=1M] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2 00: 86 80 29 12 07 00 90 02 09 00 00 02 08 20 00 00 10: 00 00 02 da 01 c8 00 00 00 00 00 da 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 86 80 11 00 30: 00 00 00 00 dc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 01 08 38 00:13.0 Unknown mass storage controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT366 / HPT370 (rev 01) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 120, IRQ 18 I/O ports at cc00 [size=8] I/O ports at d000 [size=4] I/O ports at d400 [size=256] Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=128K] 00: 03 11 04 00 05 00 00 02 01 00 80 01 08 78 80 00 10: 01 cc 00 00 01 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 01 d4 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 08 08 00:13.1 Unknown mass storage controller: Triones Technologies, Inc. HPT366 / HPT370 (rev 01) Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 120, IRQ 18 I/O ports at d800 [size=8] I/O ports at dc00 [size=4] I/O ports at e000 [size=256] 00: 03 11 04 00 07 00 00 02 01 00 80 01 08 78 80 00 10: 01 d8 00 00 01 dc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20: 01 e0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 02 08 08 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G200 AGP (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA]) Subsystem: Matrox Graphics, Inc. Millennium G200 AGP Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 16 Memory at d8000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=16M] Memory at d4000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Memory at d5000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8M] Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=64K] Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1 Capabilities: [f0] AGP version 1.0 00: 2b 10 21 05 07 00 90 02 01 00 00 03 08 20 00 00 10: 08 00 00 d8 00 00 00 d4 00 00 00 d5 00 00 00 00 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b 10 03 ff 30: 00 00 00 00 dc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 09 01 10 20 radium:/# cat /var/log/dmesg Linux version 2.4.18-pre7-ac1 (root@radium) (gcc version 2.95.4 (Debian prerelease)) #1 SMP Thu Jan 31 01:06:59 CET 2002 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000000c000000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 00000000fec01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 00000000ffff0000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) found SMP MP-table at 000f5ae0 hm, page 000f5000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f6000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f1000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f2000 reserved twice. On node 0 totalpages: 49152 zone(0): 4096 pages. zone(1): 45056 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4 Virtual Wire compatibility mode. OEM ID: OEM00000 Product ID: PROD00000000 APIC at: 0xFEE00000 Processor #0 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 Processor #1 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 I/O APIC #2 Version 17 at 0xFEC00000. Processors: 2 Kernel command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=Linux ro root=2101 Initializing CPU#0 Detected 434.324 MHz processor. Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Calibrating delay loop... 865.07 BogoMIPS Memory: 191360k/196608k available (1316k kernel code, 4864k reserved, 383k data, 240k init, 0k highmem) Dentry-cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Mount-cache hash table entries: 4096 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU: After generic, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 CPU: Common caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch (rgooch@atnf.csiro.au) mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU: After generic, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 CPU: Common caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 CPU0: Intel Celeron (Mendocino) stepping 05 per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 365.86 usecs. enabled ExtINT on CPU#0 ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000 ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000 Booting processor 1/1 eip 2000 Initializing CPU#1 masked ExtINT on CPU#1 ESR value before enabling vector: 00000000 ESR value after enabling vector: 00000000 Calibrating delay loop... 868.35 BogoMIPS CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000, vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1. CPU: After generic, caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 CPU: Common caps: 0183fbff 00000000 00000000 00000000 CPU1: Intel Celeron (Mendocino) stepping 05 Total of 2 processors activated (1733.42 BogoMIPS). ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs Setting 2 in the phys_id_present_map ...changing IO-APIC physical APIC ID to 2 ... ok. init IO_APIC IRQs IO-APIC (apicid-pin) 2-0, 2-9, 2-10, 2-11, 2-12, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22, 2-23 not connected. ..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=0 number of MP IRQ sources: 19. number of IO-APIC #2 registers: 24. testing the IO APIC....................... IO APIC #2...... .... register #00: 02000000 ....... : physical APIC id: 02 .... register #01: 00170011 ....... : max redirection entries: 0017 ....... : PRQ implemented: 0 ....... : IO APIC version: 0011 .... register #02: 00000000 ....... : arbitration: 00 .... IRQ redirection table: NR Log Phy Mask Trig IRR Pol Stat Dest Deli Vect: 00 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 01 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 39 02 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 31 03 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 41 04 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 49 05 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 51 06 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 59 07 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 61 08 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 69 09 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0a 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0b 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0c 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0d 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 71 0e 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 79 0f 003 03 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 81 10 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 89 11 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 91 12 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 99 13 003 03 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 A1 14 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 15 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 16 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 17 000 00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 IRQ to pin mappings: IRQ0 -> 0:2 IRQ1 -> 0:1 IRQ3 -> 0:3 IRQ4 -> 0:4 IRQ5 -> 0:5 IRQ6 -> 0:6 IRQ7 -> 0:7 IRQ8 -> 0:8 IRQ13 -> 0:13 IRQ14 -> 0:14 IRQ15 -> 0:15 IRQ16 -> 0:16 IRQ17 -> 0:17 IRQ18 -> 0:18 IRQ19 -> 0:19 .................................... done. Using local APIC timer interrupts. calibrating APIC timer ... ..... CPU clock speed is 434.3005 MHz. ..... host bus clock speed is 66.8152 MHz. cpu: 0, clocks: 668152, slice: 222717 CPU0<T0:668144,T1:445424,D:3,S:222717,C:668152> cpu: 1, clocks: 668152, slice: 222717 CPU1<T0:668144,T1:222704,D:6,S:222717,C:668152> checking TSC synchronization across CPUs: passed. Waiting on wait_init_idle (map = 0x2) All processors have done init_idle mtrr: your CPUs had inconsistent fixed MTRR settings mtrr: probably your BIOS does not setup all CPUs PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb5c0, last bus=1 PCI: Using configuration type 1 PCI: Probing PCI hardware Unknown bridge resource 0: assuming transparent PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX [8086/7110] at 00:07.0 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I7,P3) -> 19 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I9,P0) -> 19 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I13,P0) -> 17 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I19,P0) -> 18 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B0,I19,P1) -> 18 PCI->APIC IRQ transform: (B1,I0,P0) -> 16 Limiting direct PCI/PCI transfers. Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 Initializing RT netlink socket IA-32 Microcode Update Driver: v1.09 <tigran@veritas.com> Starting kswapd VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.5.0 initialized Journalled Block Device driver loaded parport0: PC-style at 0x378 (0x778) [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP] parport0: irq 7 detected parport0: Legacy device i2c-core.o: i2c core module i2c-dev.o: i2c /dev entries driver module i2c-core.o: driver i2c-dev dummy driver registered. i2c-proc.o version 2.6.1 (20010825) pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled ttyS00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A ttyS01 at 0x02f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A lp0: using parport0 (polling). Real Time Clock Driver v1.10e block: 128 slots per queue, batch=32 Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 6.31 ide: Assuming 33MHz system bus speed for PIO modes; override with idebus=xx PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39 PIIX4: chipset revision 1 PIIX4: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide0: BM-DMA at 0xf000-0xf007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio ide1: BM-DMA at 0xf008-0xf00f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio HPT366: onboard version of chipset, pin1=1 pin2=2 HPT366: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 98 HPT366: chipset revision 1 HPT366: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide2: BM-DMA at 0xd400-0xd407, BIOS settings: hde:DMA, hdf:pio HPT366: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 99 HPT366: chipset revision 1 HPT366: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later ide3: BM-DMA at 0xe000-0xe007, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio hda: Maxtor 91728D8, ATA DISK drive hde: ST38421A, ATA DISK drive ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 ide2 at 0xcc00-0xcc07,0xd002 on irq 18 hda: 33750864 sectors (17280 MB) w/512KiB Cache, CHS=2100/255/63, UDMA(33) hde: 16498944 sectors (8447 MB) w/256KiB Cache, CHS=16368/16/63, UDMA(66) Partition check: hda: hda1 hde: [PTBL] [1027/255/63] hde1 hde2 < hde5 > Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077 eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://www.scyld.com/network/eepro100.html eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@saw.sw.com.sg> and others eth0: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet, 00:D0:B7:E8:A2:02, IRQ 17. Board assembly 749658-005, Physical connectors present: RJ45 Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1. General self-test: passed. Serial sub-system self-test: passed. Internal registers self-test: passed. ROM checksum self-test: passed (0xdbd8681d). PPP generic driver version 2.4.1 PPP Deflate Compression module registered PPP BSD Compression module registered Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 150M agpgart: Detected Intel 440BX chipset agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xd0000000 [drm] AGP 0.99 on Intel 440BX @ 0xd0000000 64MB [drm] Initialized mga 3.0.2 20010321 on minor 0 es1371: version v0.30 time 01:10:14 Jan 31 2002 es1371: found chip, vendor id 0x1274 device id 0x1371 revision 0x06 es1371: found es1371 rev 6 at io 0xc400 irq 19 es1371: features: joystick 0x0 ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: 0x8384:0x7609 (SigmaTel STAC9721/23) NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0 IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP IP: routing cache hash table of 2048 buckets, 16Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 16384 bind 16384) ip_conntrack (1536 buckets, 12288 max) ip_tables: (C) 2000-2002 Netfilter core team NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0. VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 240k freed Adding Swap: 72256k swap-space (priority -1) kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.17, 10 Jan 2002 on ide0(3,1), internal journal EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Ben Greear wrote: > What does the rest of the hardware-config look like? Is > the NIC attached to a 10bt hub? Are you using PCI-Riser > cards? > > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> > President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-31 16:52 ` Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-31 17:54 ` Ben Greear 2002-01-31 19:17 ` Robbert Kouprie 2002-02-01 17:52 ` PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] Edward S. Marshall 0 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2002-01-31 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robbert Kouprie; +Cc: linux-kernel Robbert Kouprie wrote: > The box is an Abit BP6 with Dual Celerons 433 and 192 Mb RAM. No > PCI-Riser cards. It is connected at 100 Mbit full duplex to a 100 > Mbit switch. APIC is enabled. No kind of power management is enabled. The only lockup problems I have run into are connecting some eepro nics to a 10bt hub, and using (cheap arsed, it appears) PCI riser cards. I have heard of some SMP related issues, but nothing concrete, and I don't have any SMP systems personally. You could try the e100, but I have no idea if it will be better or worse for your particular problem. -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* RE: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-31 17:54 ` Ben Greear @ 2002-01-31 19:17 ` Robbert Kouprie 2002-02-01 17:52 ` PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] Edward S. Marshall 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-31 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Ben Greear'; +Cc: linux-kernel I experienced the 10 Mbit half duplex problems too with this card, but they seemed to have gone away after a bugfix from Alan Cox somewhere in 2.4. Somewhere later I upgraded to 100 Mbit full duplex and never experienced problems again until 2.4.17. I think im gonna try some older kernels and look through diffs if I have time. - Robbert > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Greear [mailto:greearb@candelatech.com] > Sent: donderdag 31 januari 2002 18:54 > To: Robbert Kouprie > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) > > > > > Robbert Kouprie wrote: > > > The box is an Abit BP6 with Dual Celerons 433 and 192 Mb RAM. No > > PCI-Riser cards. It is connected at 100 Mbit full duplex to a 100 > > Mbit switch. APIC is enabled. No kind of power management > is enabled. > > > The only lockup problems I have run into are connecting some > eepro nics to > a 10bt hub, and using (cheap arsed, it appears) PCI riser > cards. I have > heard of some SMP related issues, but nothing concrete, and I don't > have any SMP systems personally. You could try the e100, but I have > no idea if it will be better or worse for your particular problem. > > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <Ben_Greear AT excite.com> > President of Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > ScryMUD: http://scry.wanfear.com http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] 2002-01-31 17:54 ` Ben Greear 2002-01-31 19:17 ` Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-02-01 17:52 ` Edward S. Marshall 2002-02-01 18:16 ` nick 2002-02-01 23:54 ` Alan Cox 1 sibling, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Edward S. Marshall @ 2002-02-01 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 11:54, Ben Greear wrote: > The only lockup problems I have run into are connecting some eepro nics to > a 10bt hub, and using (cheap arsed, it appears) PCI riser cards. I have > heard of some SMP related issues, but nothing concrete, and I don't > have any SMP systems personally. You could try the e100, but I have > no idea if it will be better or worse for your particular problem. I was running into the same problems here; SMP system w/PCI riser card (HP NetServer LPr), connected to a 10/100 switch. I'd get "wait_for_command_timeout" errors all the time under moderate network load. Switching to the e100 driver didn't help in the slightest. Eventually, I'd experience a complete system lockup. Replacing the card with a 3c59x-based card put the machine back in service (I've completely written eepro100s off as a viable cards now), although I still saw occasional PCI-related issues. Specifically: Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register 0000. Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your RAM chips Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register 0000. Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 The last two messages will repeat indefinitely, usually with a hit to the dist for each pair of log entries (resulting in a very distinctive drive grinding). Memory problems don't seem to be the issue; with a fairly extensive run of memtest86, everything came back clean. Taking a few minutes to try and rectify the situation, I started shutting down services and manually unloading modules to see what was causing the problem. Unloading usbcore did the trick: Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register 0000. Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: Too much work in interrupt, status e003. Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: usb.c: USB disconnect on device 1 Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: USB bus 1 deregistered I've rebooted the machine since then, but have always unloaded usb-uhci and usbcore after booting. The issue hasn't cropped up again, although it happened every couple of days previously. The kernel in question is Red Hat's kernel-smp-2.4.9-21 build. -- Edward S. Marshall <esm@logic.net> http://esm.logic.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. ] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] 2002-02-01 17:52 ` PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] Edward S. Marshall @ 2002-02-01 18:16 ` nick 2002-02-01 19:44 ` Ken Brownfield 2002-02-01 23:54 ` Alan Cox 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: nick @ 2002-02-01 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Edward S. Marshall; +Cc: linux-kernel Odd, I've got an HP LPr with an Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 8). on the riser. Works fine for me under the debian SMP kernel Linux version 2.4.5-686-smp (herbert@gondolin) (gcc version 2.95.4 20010319 (Debian prerelease)) #1 SMP Sun May 27 18:32:54 EST 2001. If you'd like me to test a workload or similar let me know, the system is relativly low memory though. Nick On 1 Feb 2002, Edward S. Marshall wrote: > On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 11:54, Ben Greear wrote: > > The only lockup problems I have run into are connecting some eepro nics to > > a 10bt hub, and using (cheap arsed, it appears) PCI riser cards. I have > > heard of some SMP related issues, but nothing concrete, and I don't > > have any SMP systems personally. You could try the e100, but I have > > no idea if it will be better or worse for your particular problem. > > I was running into the same problems here; SMP system w/PCI riser card > (HP NetServer LPr), connected to a 10/100 switch. I'd get > "wait_for_command_timeout" errors all the time under moderate network > load. Switching to the e100 driver didn't help in the slightest. > Eventually, I'd experience a complete system lockup. > > Replacing the card with a 3c59x-based card put the machine back in > service (I've completely written eepro100s off as a viable cards now), > although I still saw occasional PCI-related issues. Specifically: > > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but > trying to continue > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register > 0000. > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your > RAM chips > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register > 0000. > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 > > The last two messages will repeat indefinitely, usually with a hit to > the dist for each pair of log entries (resulting in a very distinctive > drive grinding). Memory problems don't seem to be the issue; with a > fairly extensive run of memtest86, everything came back clean. > > Taking a few minutes to try and rectify the situation, I started > shutting down services and manually unloading modules to see what was > causing the problem. Unloading usbcore did the trick: > > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register > 0000. > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: Too much work in interrupt, status e003. > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: usb.c: USB disconnect on device 1 > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: USB bus 1 deregistered > > I've rebooted the machine since then, but have always unloaded usb-uhci > and usbcore after booting. The issue hasn't cropped up again, although > it happened every couple of days previously. > > The kernel in question is Red Hat's kernel-smp-2.4.9-21 build. > > -- > Edward S. Marshall <esm@logic.net> > http://esm.logic.net/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [ Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. > ] > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] 2002-02-01 18:16 ` nick @ 2002-02-01 19:44 ` Ken Brownfield 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Ken Brownfield @ 2002-02-01 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: nick; +Cc: Edward S. Marshall, linux-kernel I've had LPr, LP1000r, LP2000r, and LH6000s in *heavy* production for two years straight with nary a whimper from the eepro100, e100, or e1000 drivers.* This is SMP with 2-6 procs, 256MB-4GB RAM, all 2.2 and 2.4 kernels under RH6.2. On 100/1000, never 10Mb though. Not to say that the HPs smell like roses, but I would highly suspect bad hardware or a suspect BIOS/PCB revision, etc. in this case. Just my US$0.02, -- Ken. brownfld@irridi.com * besides a quirky arp issue on boot that seemed to go away on its own and wasn't card-specific. And the long-standing I/O APIC issues. ;) On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:16:15PM -0500, nick@snowman.net wrote: | Odd, I've got an HP LPr with an Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation | 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 8). on the riser. Works fine for me under | the debian SMP kernel Linux version 2.4.5-686-smp (herbert@gondolin) (gcc | version 2.95.4 20010319 (Debian prerelease)) #1 SMP Sun May 27 18:32:54 | EST 2001. If you'd like me to test a workload or similar let me know, the | system is relativly low memory though. | Nick | | On 1 Feb 2002, Edward S. Marshall wrote: | | > On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 11:54, Ben Greear wrote: | > > The only lockup problems I have run into are connecting some eepro nics to | > > a 10bt hub, and using (cheap arsed, it appears) PCI riser cards. I have | > > heard of some SMP related issues, but nothing concrete, and I don't | > > have any SMP systems personally. You could try the e100, but I have | > > no idea if it will be better or worse for your particular problem. | > | > I was running into the same problems here; SMP system w/PCI riser card | > (HP NetServer LPr), connected to a 10/100 switch. I'd get | > "wait_for_command_timeout" errors all the time under moderate network | > load. Switching to the e100 driver didn't help in the slightest. | > Eventually, I'd experience a complete system lockup. | > | > Replacing the card with a 3c59x-based card put the machine back in | > service (I've completely written eepro100s off as a viable cards now), | > although I still saw occasional PCI-related issues. Specifically: | > | > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but | > trying to continue | > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register | > 0000. | > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 | > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your | > RAM chips | > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register | > 0000. | > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 | > | > The last two messages will repeat indefinitely, usually with a hit to | > the dist for each pair of log entries (resulting in a very distinctive | > drive grinding). Memory problems don't seem to be the issue; with a | > fairly extensive run of memtest86, everything came back clean. | > | > Taking a few minutes to try and rectify the situation, I started | > shutting down services and manually unloading modules to see what was | > causing the problem. Unloading usbcore did the trick: | > | > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register | > 0000. | > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 | > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: eth0: Too much work in interrupt, status e003. | > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: usb.c: USB disconnect on device 1 | > Jan 26 18:41:24 x kernel: USB bus 1 deregistered | > | > I've rebooted the machine since then, but have always unloaded usb-uhci | > and usbcore after booting. The issue hasn't cropped up again, although | > it happened every couple of days previously. | > | > The kernel in question is Red Hat's kernel-smp-2.4.9-21 build. | > | > -- | > Edward S. Marshall <esm@logic.net> | > http://esm.logic.net/ | > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | > [ Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. | > ] | > | > - | > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in | > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org | > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html | > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | > | | - | To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in | the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org | More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html | Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] 2002-02-01 17:52 ` PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] Edward S. Marshall 2002-02-01 18:16 ` nick @ 2002-02-01 23:54 ` Alan Cox 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2002-02-01 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Edward S. Marshall; +Cc: linux-kernel > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received. Dazed and confused, but > trying to continue > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register > 0000. > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: You probably have a hardware problem with your > RAM chips > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: Host error, FIFO diagnostic register > 0000. > Jan 23 10:11:37 x kernel: eth0: PCI bus error, bus status 80000020 Your machine took an NMI and a PCI bus diagnostic. That generally points hard to a bus problem. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201201531570.6499-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>]
* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201201531570.6499-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca> @ 2002-01-21 10:06 ` Robbert Kouprie 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-21 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Hahn; +Cc: linux-kernel I know the bad reputation of the BP6, I see APIC errors every day since the specific printk was added in 2.4.0, but system is fairly stable. Last time it was unstable the cause was the Intel eepro100, which turned out to suffer from a chipset bug, which is now corrected for in the eepro100.c driver. I ran 2.4 kernels with this NIC and the corrected driver since 2.4.14 or so and never had problems. 2.4.16 ran for 40 days without trouble. My BP6 bios is the most recent (RU revision). I can't really say "noapic" helps as I have no way to reproduce this. It was just a one time message, which was very similar to the earlier bug report to lkml I mentioned, that's why I reported it. If someone has any clues on how to reproduce this I am happy to do some testing. Regards, - Robbert On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Mark Hahn wrote: > > I have an Abit BP6 Dual Celeron 433, 192 Mb RAM, Intel NIC on 100 Mbit, > > I assume you know that the BP6 is quite notorious for it's > rather ignoble irq and apic handling? is it safe to assume > you have a recent bios installed? does booting "noapic" help? > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <yqo1ygkd8np.fsf@penguin.ucs.ed.ac.uk>]
* RE: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) [not found] <yqo1ygkd8np.fsf@penguin.ucs.ed.ac.uk> @ 2002-01-20 21:53 ` Robbert Kouprie 2002-01-21 18:48 ` Jussi Laako 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-20 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 'Kenneth MacDonald'; +Cc: linux-kernel Hi Kenny, Thanks for the quick reply :) Just checked it, and it's in slot 2, so that's not the problem. It doesn't share the HPT366 IRQ. This is my /proc/interrupts: radium:/$ cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 CPU1 0: 1207342 1186359 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 3 1 IO-APIC-edge keyboard 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade 4: 68 55 IO-APIC-edge serial 8: 2 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc 14: 6 12 IO-APIC-edge ide0 17: 1723020 1719230 IO-APIC-level eth0 18: 33419 33452 IO-APIC-level ide2 19: 0 0 IO-APIC-level es1371 NMI: 0 0 LOC: 2393677 2393676 ERR: 14 MIS: 0 Regards, - Robbert > -----Original Message----- > From: kenny@penguin.ucs.ed.ac.uk > [mailto:kenny@penguin.ucs.ed.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Kenneth MacDonald > Sent: zondag 20 januari 2002 22:18 > To: Robbert Kouprie > Subject: Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) > > > Do you have the NIC in slot 3? Read your motherboard manual, > page 1-4. > > Hope that helps, just in case! > -- > Kenny > > ADML Support, EUCS, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland. > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) 2002-01-20 21:53 ` Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-21 18:48 ` Jussi Laako 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Jussi Laako @ 2002-01-21 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robbert Kouprie; +Cc: 'Kenneth MacDonald', linux-kernel Robbert Kouprie wrote: > > Thanks for the quick reply :) Just checked it, and it's in slot 2, so > that's not the problem. It doesn't share the HPT366 IRQ. This is my > /proc/interrupts: Driver is eepro100? I suspect there is something in eepro100 driver that should be protected by a spinlock but is not. I haven't got time to analyze it further, yet... - Jussi Laako -- PGP key fingerprint: 161D 6FED 6A92 39E2 EB5B 39DD A4DE 63EB C216 1E4B Available at PGP keyservers ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)
@ 2002-01-20 19:16 Robbert Kouprie
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Robbert Kouprie @ 2002-01-20 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi all,
I have an Abit BP6 Dual Celeron 433, 192 Mb RAM, Intel NIC on 100 Mbit,
running Debian Woody with Linux kernel 2.4.17 from source. This weekend
the network card totally locked up. No network connections were possible
anymore and system logs were full of NETDEV errors (included below).
Note the "unexpected IRQ trap" which started this. Soft rebooting the
system was not possible anymore as the system hung on these NETDEV
errors after issueing the "reboot" command. I performed a little search
on the error message and found an earlier lkml message which looks like
exactly the same problem:
http://lists.kernelnotes.de/linux-kernel/Week-of-Mon-20010618/026269.htm
l
Did anyone ever found out the problem here?
Regards,
- Robbert Kouprie
radium:/$ lspci -vx -d 8086:1229
00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82557 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev
09)
Subsystem: Intel Corp.: Unknown device 0011
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 17
Memory at da020000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K]
I/O ports at c800 [size=64]
Memory at da000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled] [size=1M]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
00: 86 80 29 12 07 00 90 02 09 00 00 02 08 20 00 00
10: 00 00 02 da 01 c8 00 00 00 00 00 da 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 86 80 11 00
30: 00 00 00 00 dc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0a 01 08 38
Jan 19 01:27:16 radium kernel: unexpected IRQ trap at vector 7d
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out: status f048
0c00 at 15835657/15835685 command 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: Tx ring dump, Tx queue 15835685 /
15835657:
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 0 200ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 1 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 2 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 3 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 4 400ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: = 5 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 6 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 7 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 8 200ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: * 9 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 10 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 11 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 12 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 13 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 14 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 15 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 16 200ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 17 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 18 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 19 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 20 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 21 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 22 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 23 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 24 200ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 25 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 26 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 27 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 28 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 29 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 30 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 31 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: Printing Rx ring (next to receive
into 13805956, dirty index 13805956).
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 0 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 1 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 2 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: l 3 c000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: *= 4 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 5 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 6 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 7 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 8 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 9 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 10 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 11 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 12 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 13 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 14 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 15 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 16 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 17 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 18 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 19 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 20 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 21 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 22 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 23 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 24 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 25 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 26 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 27 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 28 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 29 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 30 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:29:11 radium kernel: eth0: 31 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out: status f048
0c00 at 15835685/15835713 command 0001a000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: Tx ring dump, Tx queue 15835713 /
15835685:
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 0 600ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: = 1 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 2 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 3 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 4 400ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: * 5 0001a000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 6 0002a000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 7 0003a000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 8 200ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 9 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 10 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 11 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 12 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 13 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 14 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 15 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 16 200ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 17 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 18 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 19 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 20 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 21 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 22 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 23 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 24 200ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 25 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 26 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 27 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 28 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 29 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 30 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 31 000ca000.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: Printing Rx ring (next to receive
into 13805956, dirty index 13805956).
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 0 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 1 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 2 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: l 3 c000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: *= 4 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 5 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 6 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 7 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 8 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 9 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 10 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 11 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 12 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 13 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 14 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 15 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 16 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 17 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 18 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 19 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 20 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 21 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 22 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 23 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 24 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 25 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 26 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 27 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 28 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 29 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 30 0000a020.
Jan 19 01:30:17 radium kernel: eth0: 31 0000a020.
... And so on (2 Mb of logs available ;))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in threadend of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-01 23:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-22 8:51 NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) Robbert Kouprie
2002-01-22 14:53 ` James Bourne
2002-01-30 19:29 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-01-30 21:06 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-31 0:27 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-01-31 12:35 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-01-31 16:32 ` Ben Greear
2002-01-31 16:52 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-01-31 17:54 ` Ben Greear
2002-01-31 19:17 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-02-01 17:52 ` PCI Problems [was Re: NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557)] Edward S. Marshall
2002-02-01 18:16 ` nick
2002-02-01 19:44 ` Ken Brownfield
2002-02-01 23:54 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201201531570.6499-100000@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca>
2002-01-21 10:06 ` NIC lockup in 2.4.17 (SMP/APIC/Intel 82557) Robbert Kouprie
[not found] <yqo1ygkd8np.fsf@penguin.ucs.ed.ac.uk>
2002-01-20 21:53 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-01-21 18:48 ` Jussi Laako
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-20 19:16 Robbert Kouprie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox