From: "Guillaume Boissiere" <boissiere@mediaone.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: New device naming convention
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 01:39:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C59F1C3.21004.28F8E65B@localhost> (raw)
I added this item on my kernel 2.5 status list a few weeks ago, and
it seems to be _the_ hot topic for 2.5.
o Pending Finalize new device naming convention (Linus Torvalds)
What exactly are people expecting Linus to decide on? And once it
has been decided, what is the next step after that?
I really don't want to start a flame war on the subject (so please
refrain from rants), I am just trying to understand what people are
waiting for.
Anyone care to explain? Thanks,
-- Guillaume
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-01 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-01 6:39 Guillaume Boissiere [this message]
2002-02-01 18:01 ` New device naming convention Tim Pepper
2002-02-06 16:05 ` Guillaume Boissiere
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C59F1C3.21004.28F8E65B@localhost \
--to=boissiere@mediaone.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox