From: Steffen Persvold <sp@scali.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Short question regarding generic_make_request()
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 23:27:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C5DB965.643661F2@scali.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C5D3BC9.CA9E24A@scali.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0202031632580.11943-100000@localhost.localdomain> <20020203143946.H29553@suse.de>
Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 03 2002, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Steffen Persvold wrote:
> >
> > > Can generic_make_request() be called from interrupt level (or tasklet)
> > > ?
> >
> > no.
>
> In theory, READA from interrupt context would be ok, though. That
> doesn't work in real-life due to the non flag saving spin locking in
> __make_request.
>
Ok, the reason I'm asking is that I receive a request from a remote machine on interrupt level
(tasklet) and want to submit this to the local device. The reason I'm using a tasklet instead of a
kernel thread is that somewhere between RedHat's 2.4.3-12 and 2.4.9-12 kernels the latency of waking
up a kernel thread increased (using a semaphore method similar to the one used in loop.c). I don't
know why this happened, but I guess that if I still could use a kernel thread there wouldn't be any
problems using generic_make_request().
Regards,
--
Steffen Persvold | Scalable Linux Systems | Try out the world's best
mailto:sp@scali.com | http://www.scali.com | performing MPI implementation:
Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 | - ScaMPI 1.13.8 -
Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY | >320MBytes/s and <4uS latency
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-03 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-03 13:31 Short question regarding generic_make_request() Steffen Persvold
2002-02-03 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-03 13:39 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-03 22:27 ` Steffen Persvold [this message]
2002-02-04 0:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-04 8:57 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-02-04 12:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-02-04 11:56 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-02-04 12:01 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-02-03 22:18 ` Steffen Persvold
2002-02-04 0:24 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C5DB965.643661F2@scali.com \
--to=sp@scali.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox