From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: Aaron Sethman <androsyn@ratbox.org>
Cc: Kev <klmitch@MIT.EDU>, Arjen Wolfs <arjen@euro.net>,
coder-com@undernet.org, feedback@distributopia.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Re: PROBLEM: high system usage / poor SMPnetwork performance
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:38:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C5DE630.508DE9DB@kegel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202032019250.3086-100000@simon.ratbox.org>
Aaron Sethman wrote:
>
> > 2. you need to wrap your read()/write() calls on the socket with code
> > that notices EWOULDBLOCK
> This is perhaps the part we it disagrees with our code. I will
> investigate this part. The way we normally do things is have callbacks
> per fd, that get called when our event occurs doing the read, or, write
> directly.
That sounds totally fine; in fact, it's how my Poller library works.
> We do check for the EWOULDBLOCK stuff and re-register the
> event.
But do you remember that this fd is ready until EWOULDBLOCK?
i.e. if you're notified that an fd is ready, and then you
don't for whatever reason continue to do I/O on it until EWOULDBLOCK,
you'll never ever be notified that it's ready again.
If your code assumes that it will be notified again anyway,
as with poll(), it will be sorely disappointed.
> The thing we do not currently do is, attempt to read or write
> unless we've received notification first. This is what I am assuming is
> breaking it.
Yeah, that would break it, too, I think.
- Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-04 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-29 18:00 PROBLEM: high system usage / poor SMP network performance Dan Kegel
2002-01-29 20:09 ` Vincent Sweeney
2002-01-31 5:24 ` Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <001d01c1aa8e$2e067e60$0201010a@frodo>
2002-02-03 8:03 ` Dan Kegel
2002-02-03 8:36 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-04 14:57 ` [Coder-Com] " Darren Smith
2002-02-04 17:41 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 18:11 ` Darren Smith
2002-02-04 18:30 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 18:48 ` Kev
2002-02-04 18:59 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 18:53 ` Doug McNaught
2002-02-08 22:11 ` James Antill
2002-02-12 18:48 ` Vincent Sweeney
2002-02-03 19:22 ` Kev
[not found] ` <5.1.0.14.2.20020203173247.02c946e8@pop.euronet.nl>
2002-02-03 19:16 ` [Coder-Com] Re: PROBLEM: high system usage / poor SMPnetwork performance Dan Kegel
2002-02-04 0:07 ` Kev
2002-02-04 0:37 ` Dan Kegel
2002-02-04 0:59 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 1:16 ` Dan Kegel
2002-02-04 1:30 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 1:38 ` Dan Kegel [this message]
2002-02-04 4:38 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 5:35 ` Dan Kegel
2002-02-04 5:43 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 6:11 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-04 6:26 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 6:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-04 6:39 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 2:55 ` Kev
2002-02-04 3:25 ` Dan Kegel
2002-02-04 4:47 ` Aaron Sethman
2002-02-04 5:10 ` Kev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C5DE630.508DE9DB@kegel.com \
--to=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=androsyn@ratbox.org \
--cc=arjen@euro.net \
--cc=coder-com@undernet.org \
--cc=feedback@distributopia.com \
--cc=klmitch@MIT.EDU \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox