From: Mark McClelland <mark@alpha.dyndns.org>
To: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Cc: Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kraxel@bytesex.org
Subject: Re: [V4L] [PATCH/RFC] videodev.[ch] redesign
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 19:58:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C65EFF4.2000906@alpha.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020209194602.A23061@bytesex.org>
Gerd Knorr wrote:
>It also provides a ioctl wrapper function which handles copying the
>ioctl args from/to userspace, so we have this at one place can drop all
>the copy_from/to_user calls within the v4l device driver ioctl handlers.
>
Excellent work. I have no complaints, just a few questions:
1. Would it be better to memset the temp buffer in video_generic_ioctl()
rather than in the driver? I've seen so many drivers forget to do this,
and it's a potential (albeit very small) security hole.
2. In skeleton_open(), couldn't the device_data lookup code be replaced
with:
struct video_device *vdev = video_devdata(file);
struct device_data *dev = vdev->priv;
3. In skeleton_initdev(), shouldn't...
dev->vdev = skeleton_template;
...be...
memcpy(&dev->vdev, &skeleton_template, sizeof(skeleton_template);
4. Is it safe to keep even 128 bytes on the stack in
video_generic_ioctl()? Consider that devices might spend a relatively
long time blocking on VIDIOCSYNC. With 32 devices in use at once, you'd
be coming dangerously close to a stack overflow. IMHO it would be better
to only allocate as much as MCAPTURE and SYNC need, and fall back on
kmalloc for the less time-critical ones (if necessary).
Other than that, I extremely happy with what you've done!
--
Mark McClelland
mmcclell@bigfoot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-10 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-09 18:46 [PATCH/RFC] videodev.[ch] redesign Gerd Knorr
2002-02-09 20:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-02-09 20:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-02-09 20:44 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-02-10 0:32 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-02-10 8:34 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-02-10 2:03 ` [V4L] " Alan Cox
2002-02-10 8:59 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-02-11 21:10 ` [PATCH/RFC] videodev.[ch] redesign -- take #2 Gerd Knorr
2002-02-10 3:58 ` Mark McClelland [this message]
2002-02-10 9:11 ` [V4L] [PATCH/RFC] videodev.[ch] redesign Gerd Knorr
2002-02-10 12:54 ` Mark McClelland
2002-02-11 9:55 ` Gerd Knorr
2002-02-11 11:58 ` Mark McClelland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C65EFF4.2000906@alpha.dyndns.org \
--to=mark@alpha.dyndns.org \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox