From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: another IDE cleanup: kill duplicated code
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:45:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C690E56.3070606@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020211221102.GA131@elf.ucw.cz> <3C68F3F3.8030709@evision-ventures.com> <20020212132846.A7966@suse.cz>
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>>The first does control an array of values, which doesn't make sense in
>>first place. I.e. changing it doesn't
>>change ANY behaviour of the kernel.
>>
>
>Actually HFS uses it ...
>
Please note that the use in HFS is inappriopriate. It's supposed to
optimize the
read throughput there, which is something that shouldn't be done at the
fs setup
layer at all. The usage of read_ahead there can be just removed and
everything should be fine (modulo the fact that in current state the HFS
filesystem code
is just non-working obsolete code garbage anyway ;-).
>>The second of them is trying to control a file-system level constant
>>inside the actual block device driver. This is a blatant violation of
>>the layering principle in software design, and should go as soon as
>>possible.
>>
>
>Yes. But still block device drivers allocate the array ...
>
Well if we do:
find ./ -name "*.c" -exec grep max_readahead /dev/null {} \;
One can already easly see that apart from ide, md, and acorn drivers
this has been already abstracted
away one level up at the block device handling as well. My suspiction is
that there is now already
*double* initialization of the sub-slices of this array there. Anyway
ide should be adapted here to the
same way as it's done now for scsi.
Will you look after this or should me? (I can't until afternoon, becouse
I'm at my "true live" job now
and have other things to do...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-12 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-11 22:11 another IDE cleanup: kill duplicated code Pavel Machek
2002-02-12 10:52 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 12:28 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 12:45 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-02-12 12:57 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 13:17 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 13:43 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 13:58 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 14:42 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 15:23 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 15:28 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 15:35 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 16:56 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 5:50 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 7:28 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 10:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 10:35 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 10:29 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 10:56 ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-13 11:11 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 11:25 ` Matthias Andree
2002-02-12 18:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-13 12:35 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 16:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-13 16:31 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 16:57 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 5:46 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 6:42 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 7:30 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 7:47 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 7:44 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 7:58 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 20:38 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-13 11:01 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 11:03 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 11:27 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 7:05 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 12:50 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 19:19 ` Roger Larsson
2002-02-13 10:56 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 20:03 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-13 10:47 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 18:52 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-14 10:04 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-14 10:19 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-13 5:52 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 7:30 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 7:27 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 10:39 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 10:46 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 11:26 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 11:26 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 11:03 ` Daniel Egger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C690E56.3070606@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox