public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: another IDE cleanup: kill duplicated code
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:35:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C69365C.9060603@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020211221102.GA131@elf.ucw.cz> <3C68F3F3.8030709@evision-ventures.com> <20020212132846.A7966@suse.cz> <3C690E56.3070606@evision-ventures.com> <20020212135701.A16420@suse.cz> <3C6915FC.2020707@evision-ventures.com> <20020212144300.A18431@suse.cz> <3C691F9C.10303@evision-ventures.com> <20020212154251.A25201@suse.cz> <3C693357.8000204@evision-ventures.com> <20020212162834.A25617@suse.cz>

Vojtech Pavlik wrote:

>>BTW.> Since there is no longer any difference about the request head
>>handling between IDE and SCSI, what about the idea of moving the whole
>>ide interface stuff under the umbrella of SCSI host adapter? This
>>would be a true cleanup and make the whole ide-scsi and ide-atapi mess
>>go away. IDE is moving fast toward SCSI on the logical level anyway
>>and it would make the hwif macro/lookup crap in the ide code go
>>magically way! At least this generic device handler search stuff
>>should be merged between them (I'm trully tempted to give it a shoot
>>this afternoon.) The only thing it could result in, which would maybe
>>surprise some would be the fact that the major of his root device
>>could just go suddenly away... But hey! What's the heck - we are in
>>odd kernel series anyway ;-).
>>
>
>This is an idea I'm toying with for quite a long time already. And I
>think this is a good idea as well. I have no more time to spend coding
>today, so if you have the afternoon, but I'll definitely find some to
>read the diff if you do this change!
>

Well could you do me a mall favour of dumping a combined ide cleanup 
relative to 2.5.4 on me?
In contrast to Linus I don't like scattered patches ;-). I will at least 
give it a deep code look today for the
ide-cdrom stuff, becouse it was always annoying to me that the default 
distribution setup
is using the ide interface to my CD-recorder and every single recorder 
aplication out there
is using the scsi interface instead.



  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-12 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-11 22:11 another IDE cleanup: kill duplicated code Pavel Machek
2002-02-12 10:52 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 12:28   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 12:45     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 12:57       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 13:17         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 13:43           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 13:58             ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 14:42               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 15:23                 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 15:28                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 15:35                     ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-02-12 16:56                       ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13  5:50                     ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13  7:28                       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 10:53                         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 10:35                       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 10:29                         ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 10:56                           ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-13 11:11                             ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 11:25                               ` Matthias Andree
2002-02-12 18:28                   ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-13 12:35                     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 16:24                       ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-13 16:31                         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 16:57             ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13  5:46               ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13  6:42                 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13  7:30                   ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13  7:47                     ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13  7:44                       ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13  7:58                         ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 20:38                         ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-13 11:01                       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 11:03                         ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-13 11:27                           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13  7:05                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-12 12:50     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 19:19   ` Roger Larsson
2002-02-13 10:56     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-12 20:03   ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-13 10:47     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-13 18:52       ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-14 10:04         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-14 10:19           ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-13  5:52 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13  7:30   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13  7:27     ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 10:39       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 10:46         ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 11:26           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-13 11:26             ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-13 11:03   ` Daniel Egger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C69365C.9060603@evision-ventures.com \
    --to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox