From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:59:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:58:59 -0500 Received: from [62.47.19.142] ([62.47.19.142]:7297 "HELO twinny.dyndns.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 20 Feb 2002 13:58:46 -0500 Message-ID: <3C73EEC8.EF99F953@webit.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:45:28 +0100 From: Thomas Winischhofer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,en-GB,en-US,de-AT,de-DE,de-CH,sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: walt Subject: Re: [2.2.18-rc1] sis.o missing symbol errors (still) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org walt wrote: > In order to avoid missing-symbol errors for drm/sis.o > *all* of the following options must be set, even though > the specified SiS chips are not being used: > > CONFIG_FB=y > CONFIG_FB_SIS=y/m > CONFIG_FB_SIS_300=y > CONFIG_FB_SIS_315=y I have a 630 and sisfb and sis (drm) compile well *without* 315... Just remember to insmod sisfb.o BEFORE sis.o. Thomas -- Thomas Winischhofer Vienna/Austria mailto:tw@webit.com *** http://www.webit.com/tw