From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sunsite.dk>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@drgw.net>,
wli@holomorphy.com, torvalds@transmeta.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bring sanity to div64.h and do_div usage
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:17:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7660F5.FC238A7E@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020208113710.04ecedf0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <20020207234555.N17426@altus.drgw.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020208113710.04ecedf0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <5.1.0.14.2.20020208181656.03862ec0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <d37kp5v9y5.fsf@lxplus050.cern.ch>
Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
> Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> writes:
>
> > At 17:57 08/02/02, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > >Well, there's a reason I left out CONFIG_M68K deps.. Go tell me where
> > >CONFIG_M68K is defined.. ;)
> >
> > Appologies, it's in Configure.help but that is not a too useful places to
> > have it. However the kernel seems to be using:
> >
> > #if defined(__mc68000__) so just use that instead. Any m68k people reading
> > this care to comment?
>
> __mc68000__ is the correct define, I don't know who put in CONFIG_M68K
> but it doesn't belong there.
I disagree -- look at arch/*/config.in.
Each arch needs to define a CONFIG_$ARCH.
It looks like cris and mk68 are one of the few arches that fail to do
this...
> # Identify this as a Sparc64 build
> define_bool CONFIG_SPARC64 y
Sigh, this should be in an 'arch' specification :)
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | "UNIX enhancements aren't."
Building 1024 | -- says /usr/games/fortune
MandrakeSoft |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-22 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-08 5:45 [PATCH] bring sanity to div64.h and do_div usage Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-08 12:15 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-02-08 17:57 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-08 18:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-02-08 19:34 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-02-08 21:16 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-15 18:47 ` Updated div64.h cleanup Troy Benjegerdes
2002-02-22 14:59 ` [PATCH] bring sanity to div64.h and do_div usage Jes Sorensen
2002-02-22 15:17 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2002-02-22 15:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-02-22 15:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-22 15:34 ` Jes Sorensen
2002-02-22 16:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-22 15:55 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-22 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-22 16:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-02-08 12:29 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-02-08 19:04 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C7660F5.FC238A7E@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=hozer@drgw.net \
--cc=jes@sunsite.dk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox