Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops

John Levon
2002-02-23T22:00:33Z

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 12:06:48PM -0700, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:

> With preemption this turns into a problem that is easier to solve
> with a lock or by not having per-cpu caches in the first place --

whilst you're correct (pre-emption has made everything harder), there's
not much point moaning about it, since it's in linus' kernel now. So
why bother ?

regards
john

--
"Oh dear, more knobs."
- David Chase