From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Lord <lord@sgi.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:47:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C782A00.CBB858EA@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C773C02.93C7753E@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <1014449389.1003.149.camel@phantasy.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3C774AC8.5E0848A2@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <3C77F503.1060005@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <p73y9hjq5mw.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de> <3C78045C.668AB945@zip.com.au> <3C780702.9060109@sgi.com> <3C780CDA.FEAF9CB4@zip.com.au> <3C781362.7070103@sgi.com> <3C781909.F69D8791@zip.com.au>, <3C781909.F69D8791@zip.com.au> <20020223230755.GO20060@matchmail.com>
Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 02:34:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Unfortunately I seem to have found a bug in existing ext2, a bug
> > in existing block_write_full_page, a probable bug in the aic7xxx
> > driver, and an oops in the aic7xxx driver. So progress has slowed
> > down a bit :(
>
> Are these bugs in 2.4 also?
The test case is:
- 120 megabyte filesystem, 1k blocksize ext2. SMP.
- run `dbench 64 2>/dev/null >/dev/null', as root (dunno
if rootness matters, but it affects ext2 allocation policy).
This really hammers the out-of-space handling.
We get a stream of `__block_prepare_write: zeroing uptodate buffer'
messages. I added that message. I shall work out whether there's
a bug, or if the message just gets killed. This happens in 2.4 also.
We get a handful of `VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer' messages,
coming from this code:
/* Next simple case - plain lookup or failed read of indirect block */
if (!create || err == -EIO) {
cleanup:
while (partial > chain) {
brelse(partial->bh);
partial--;
}
in ext2_get_block(). This only happens in 2.5. It happens on uniprocessor.
Possibly a bug introduced by the changed ext2 locking in 2.5. I have not
investigated further.
With my I/O scheduling changes the SCSI driver gets all upset about
data overruns or such. This may be my fault. It's a 2.5 issue.
During recovery from the data overrun, the SCSI driver oopses
over manipulation of a dodgy-looking timer struct.
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-23 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1014444810.1003.53.camel@phantasy.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C773C02.93C7753E@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1014449389.1003.149.camel@phantasy.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C774AC8.5E0848A2@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C77F503.1060005@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <3C77FB35.16844FE7@zip.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-02-23 20:56 ` [PATCH] only irq-safe atomic ops Andi Kleen
2002-02-23 21:06 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 21:17 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-23 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 22:10 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-23 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 23:07 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-23 23:47 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-02-25 13:02 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-25 13:12 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-25 13:18 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-25 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-25 19:45 ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25 20:05 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 6:13 Robert Love
2002-02-23 6:51 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 7:29 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 7:54 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 11:38 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 18:20 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 19:06 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 21:57 ` Roman Zippel
2002-02-23 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 22:23 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 22:40 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 22:48 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 23:13 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 23:45 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-24 1:05 ` yodaiken
2002-02-24 1:08 ` Robert Love
2002-02-23 22:00 ` John Levon
2002-02-23 22:43 ` yodaiken
2002-02-23 20:01 ` Stephen Lord
2002-02-23 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-23 9:38 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C782A00.CBB858EA@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox