public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:47:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C79435E.8030208@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200202241352.g1ODqeb08003.aeb@apps.cwi.nl>

Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
>>Since this apparently didn't get through to the mailing list
>>I'm sending it again. This time compressed.
>>
> 
> Pity - noncompressed is better, now only people with too much time
> will look at it.
> 
> There is something else one might do.
> In ide-geometry.c there is the routine probe_cmos_for_drives().
> Long ago I already wrote "Eventually the entire routine below
> should be removed". I think this is the proper time to do this.
> 
> This probe is done only for the i386 architecture, and only
> for the first two IDE disks, and only influences their geometry.
> It has been a pain - for example, it gives the first two disks
> a different geometry from the others, which is inconvenient
> when one want a RAID of identical disks.
>
Basically I lend toward your arguments. I think too that a bios based
detection is already right and then we have now the ide-skip kernel
parameter which is allowing to exclude a drive from handling by the 
linux ide driver anyway. And I think that 2.4.x and above don't run on
i386's anymore anyway.




  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-24 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-24 13:52 [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt Andries.Brouwer
2002-02-24 19:47 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-02-24 19:54   ` arjan
2002-02-24 20:02     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 20:45       ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-02-24 21:05         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 21:03       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-02-24 19:58   ` [PATCH] IDE clean 13 Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 21:17     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-24 20:02   ` [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] IDE clean 12 3rd attempt Eric Krout
2002-02-24 20:41     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-28  9:44   ` Pavel Machek
2002-02-28 14:19     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-28 18:01       ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-28 18:13         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-02-25 11:45 ` Paul Gortmaker
2002-02-25 12:03   ` Martin Dalecki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25  1:29 Andries.Brouwer
2002-02-25  1:33 Andries.Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C79435E.8030208@evision-ventures.com \
    --to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox