public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Ken Brownfield <brownfld@irridia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] ServerWorks autodma behavior
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:12:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7B6DAE.1090809@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020226032629.A930@asooo.flowerfire.com>

Ken Brownfield wrote:
> There wasn't a specific MAINTAINER for this stuff, other than perhaps
> Andre Hedrick by proxy, so I decided it might be best to post this
> directly.
> 
> I have a lot of ServerWorks OSB4 IDE hardware, which has the annoyingly
> suboptimal behavior of corrupting filesystems when DMA is active.
> Unfortunately, serverworks.c (in recent 2.4, at least) does not honor
> the CONFIG_IDEDMA_AUTO config option -- it turns dma on only unless
> "ide=nodma" is set on the kernel command line.
> 
> Personally, I think the correct behavior is for the subdrivers to honor
> this config value.  However, only VIA behaves in this way, and PIIX only
> because of its funky CONFIG_PIIX_TUNING config.  This obviates having to
> modify lilo.conf (or similar) on all machines, and having to remember
> to do so, etc etc.
> 
> The alternative is that, somewhat unintuitively, the correct behavior is
> for the subdrivers to make their own non-CONFIGurable decisions on DMA.
> In this case, VIA and PIIX should be corrected, I would think.
> 
> In any case, I've appended the patch I'm using to be able to turn off
> auto-DMA at config-time rather than run-time for ServerWorks.  One
> alternative is to shed this code altogether, since ide-pci.c seems to
> set a rational default.

I think (not 100% becouse not re-checked against the code),
you could just have removed the lines

if (!noautodma)
	hwif->autodma = 1;

and all should be well ;-).



  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 11:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26  9:26 [PATCH][RFC] ServerWorks autodma behavior Ken Brownfield
2002-02-26  9:52 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26  9:37   ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-26 10:27     ` Ken Brownfield
2002-02-26 10:50       ` Andre Hedrick
2002-02-26 19:14         ` Gunther Mayer
2002-02-26 10:19   ` Ken Brownfield
2002-02-26 11:12 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-02-27  1:01   ` Ken Brownfield
2002-02-27 10:21     ` Martin Dalecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C7B6DAE.1090809@evision-ventures.com \
    --to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
    --cc=brownfld@irridia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox