From: "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@suse.de,
Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
Subject: Re: Oopses in scheduler on Linux-2.4.17-xfs
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 15:43:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7B9F29.1FFD6F71@loewe-komp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E16Qerz-00070o-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Alan Cox schrieb:
>
> > I recently get oopses on 2.4.14-xfs and 2.4.17-xfs.
> > box is SMP with old Pentium Pro
> > There were some changes with erratas of the Pro ans something
> > with "cacheline alignment" and a fence.
>
> Unrelated - in fact you have bugs before and after. The fixes in question
> were two sets
>
> 1. In certain bizarre situations the ppro violates store ordering. It
> needs lock based spin_unlock to avoid that. Ditto locks to ensure
> stores don't bypass stuff on pci_map interfaces. (This btw is the
> same errata as the FENCE stuff in libglide is all about)
>
> 2. Certain address ranges must never be cached on the ppro due to an
> errata. We broke that in two ways - if there was RAM there, and
> if we mapped a card there and set MTRR's to write combine it.
>
Perhaps you three remember my reports about crashes in the scheduler.
After I was able to fetch an Oops on 2.4.17 (without kdb) I noticed
this:
my bt848 didn't generate any interrupts (so videotext and epg didn't work
but TV worked)
In a last temptation I checked the BIOS and switched from MPP 1.4 to 1.1
And guess what? The box is running fine again for several weeks.
The BIOS was buggy before(different MTRR on CPUs) , I upgraded "years" ago.
I can't remember when I switched this entry in the BIOS.
Possibly there is a bug in the MPP tables (setup through BIOS) when set to 1.4?
Damn, never play with your BIOS settings if the box runs fine ... especially
if you forget that fact ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-26 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-15 22:51 Oopses in scheduler on Linux-2.4.17-xfs Peter Wächtler
2002-01-15 23:54 ` Dave Jones
2002-01-16 1:28 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 14:43 ` Peter Wächtler [this message]
[not found] ` <3C44B40E.FEDE24C8@zip.com.au>
2002-01-16 22:50 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-01-17 16:09 ` Peter Wächtler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C7B9F29.1FFD6F71@loewe-komp.de \
--to=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davej@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox