public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rainer Ellinger <rainer@ellinger.de>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolabs.com>,
	"Dennis, Jim" <jdennis@snapserver.com>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Congrats Marcelo,
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 00:23:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7C18EB.4090509@ellinger.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2D0AFEFEE711D611923E009027D39F2B153AD4@cdserv.meridian-data.com> <20020226140644.U12832@lynx.adilger.int> <1014760581.5993.159.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com> <E16f8Ey-0002qn-00@starship.berlin>

Daniel Phillips wrote:

> I'd really like to see XFS go in, but don't you think 2.5 is the place,
> with a view to 2.4 submission in due course?

In my opinion the main problem behind the originating note is the big difference between the mainline "linus" kernel and what 
people really need or are really using. And this might be also a problem for development. Take distribution vendor kernels: make a 
diff of your favorite distribution kernel and the vanilla one and think about it. SuSE allows a detailed look inside at 
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mantel/next/patches-2.4.18-0.tar.bz2

I think development in 2.5 should focus on including this waiting patches and come to a end and release asap. I think it's more 
important to catch up with real world needs and existing patches, than working on new developments.

> As far as making the case goes, do you have time to make a list of
> places where XFS goes outside fs/xfs, and why?

For me ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches/2.4.17/README does it. ;-)

-- 
rainer@ellinger.de


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-02-26 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-26 20:38 Congrats Marcelo, Dennis, Jim
2002-02-26 20:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-02-26 21:06 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-02-26 21:15   ` crypto (was Re: Congrats Marcelo,) Jeff Garzik
2002-02-26 21:35     ` Robert Love
2002-02-26 21:40       ` arjan
2002-02-26 21:47         ` Robert Love
2002-02-24 23:51           ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-28 22:32             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-01  9:50               ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-27  9:41       ` Francois Romieu
2002-02-26 22:33     ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 21:15       ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 21:57         ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-27 22:29           ` Michael H. Warfield
2002-02-27 23:06             ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 21:56   ` Congrats Marcelo, Steve Lord
2002-02-24 23:39     ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:07       ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  0:10         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:23       ` Rainer Ellinger [this message]
2002-02-25  0:38         ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:59         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27  0:47           ` Rainer Ellinger
2002-02-27  1:03             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-27  1:08             ` Matthew D. Pitts
2002-02-26 22:59     ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 22:59       ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  0:28         ` Whither XFS? (was: Congrats Marcelo) Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:39           ` Steve Lord
2002-02-25  8:22             ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 23:00     ` Congrats Marcelo, J.A. Magallon
2002-02-28 21:52 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-03-01  0:01   ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  0:37     ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:13       ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:03         ` Dave Jones
2002-03-01  1:51           ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01  1:28     ` Theodore Tso
2002-03-01  1:53       ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02 22:35         ` Hans-Peter Jansen
2002-03-02  3:43   ` Stephen Degler
2002-02-28 22:41 ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-01  9:30 Andries.Brouwer
2002-03-01 18:33 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-02  4:13 Dennis, Jim
2002-03-02 18:24 ` David Ford
2002-03-03 22:58 ` Florian Weimer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C7C18EB.4090509@ellinger.de \
    --to=rainer@ellinger.de \
    --cc=adilger@turbolabs.com \
    --cc=jdennis@snapserver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lord@sgi.com \
    --cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox