From: dart <dart@windeath.2y.net>
To: davidsen@tmr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:41:43 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C7F22A7.BA7916DF@windeath.2y.net> (raw)
<massive snippage>
> That sounds very nice, but in practice it means it would never happen, and
> you know it.
Excuse me...I've been a lurker and sometimes tester since 2.0.*. I've
been working my way through man (3) to learn enough to submit a coherent
patch and I don't appreciate you telling me I can't do it. I've searched
your submissions to LKML and all I see are opinions, ie ==
!code_submitted.
> This process could take six months to a year, after which we can start the
> process with the scheduler.
Who exactly are "we" anyway? I know it's not me because I haven't
contributed DIDDLY for code just yet.
Just a note: CD Burner, Parport/ECP/EPP/Zip broken with 2.4.17, will try
2.4.19. 2.4.18 too ugly to test.
Apologies to the kernel-list, I usually try to limit my noise...
--
Dart
"I have studied many philosophers and many cats.
The wisdom of cats is infinitely superior." -- Hippolyte Taine
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-01 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-01 6:41 dart [this message]
2002-03-05 21:49 ` 2.4.19-preX: What we really need: -AA patches finally in the tree Bill Davidsen
2002-03-06 1:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 1:45 ` James M.
2002-03-06 16:50 ` Ken Brownfield
2002-03-07 10:11 ` Leonid Mamtchenkov
2002-03-06 23:34 ` Yven Leist
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-26 0:35 Dieter Nützel
2002-02-26 1:02 ` Ken Brownfield
2002-02-26 1:13 ` Andrew Morton
2002-02-26 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2002-02-26 1:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 1:15 ` Shawn Starr
2002-02-26 1:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-24 5:44 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-02-26 4:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-26 11:42 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 1:40 ` Rik van Riel
2002-02-26 1:49 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-02-26 1:51 ` Alan Cox
2002-02-26 8:36 ` Christoph Rohland
2002-02-26 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-02-26 16:21 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-02-26 16:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-02-28 22:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-02-28 23:04 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-01 3:02 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-01 3:13 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-01 3:43 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-01 10:36 ` Sean Hunter
2002-03-01 17:13 ` Davide Libenzi
2002-03-01 6:29 ` Olivier Galibert
2002-03-01 16:28 ` Dan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C7F22A7.BA7916DF@windeath.2y.net \
--to=dart@windeath.2y.net \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox