From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] delayed disk block allocation
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 23:27:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C8321DE.EE6A47B0@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C7F3B4A.41DB7754@zip.com.au> <E16hhuI-0000S6-00@starship.berlin> <3C82E5A1.714081EA@mandrakesoft.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> ...
> >
> > You're not even trying to apply this to swap cache right now are you?
>
> This is a disagreement akpm and I have, actually :)
>
Misunderstanding, rather.
Swapfiles aren't interesting, IMO. And I agree that mkswap or swapon
should just barf if the file has any holes in it.
But what I refer to here is, simply, delayed allocate for swapspace.
So swap_out() sticks the target page into the swapcache, marks it
dirty and takes a space reservation for the page out of the swapcache's
address_space. But no disk space is allocated at swap_out() time.
Instead, the real disk mapping is created when the VM calls
a_ops->vm_writeback() against the swapcache page's address_space.
All of which rather implies a ripup-and-rewrite of half the swap
code. It would certainly require a new allocator. So I just mentioned
the possibility. Glad you're interested :)
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-04 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-01 8:26 [patch] delayed disk block allocation Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 2:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-04 3:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-04 7:27 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-03-04 5:04 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 5:31 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04 5:40 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-04 6:14 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04 5:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-04 6:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2002-03-04 15:02 ` Hans Reiser
2002-03-06 12:59 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-04 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 8:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-03-04 8:34 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 7:20 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-04 9:23 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-04 14:54 rwhron
2002-03-04 15:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-07 12:06 Etienne Lorrain
2002-03-07 14:47 ` Steve Lord
2002-03-07 17:30 ` Mike Fedyk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C8321DE.EE6A47B0@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox