From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.6-pre2 IDE cleanup 16
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 12:54:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C84B1FB.2050003@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C84A34E.6060708@evision-ventures.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203051307080.12437-100000@netfinity.realnet.co.sz> <20020305112843.GE716@suse.de>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05 2002, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>>
>>
>>>- Disable configuration of the task file stuff. It is going to go away
>>> and will be replaced by a truly abstract interface based on
>>> functionality and *not* direct mess-up of hardware.
>>>
>>Could you elaborate just a tad on that.
>>
>
> While the taskfile interface is very down-to-basics and a bit extreme
> in one end, it's also very useful for eg vendors doing testing and
> certification. So in that respect it's pretty powerful, I hope Martin
> isn't just planning a stripped down interface akin to what we have in
> 2.4 and earlier.
No quite my plan is:
1. Rip it off.
2. Reimplement stuff if and only if someone really shows pressure
for using it.
The "command parsing" excess is certainly going to go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-05 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-05 7:54 [PATCH] per-cpu areas Rusty Russell
2002-03-05 10:51 ` [PATCH] 2.5.6-pre2 IDE cleanup 16 Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 11:07 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-05 11:28 ` Jens Axboe
2002-03-05 11:54 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-03-05 12:04 ` Jens Axboe
2002-03-05 12:09 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 0:33 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 9:51 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 11:48 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 0:34 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-05 12:36 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-05 12:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 12:35 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-06 0:28 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-05 12:47 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-05 12:52 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 1:40 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 8:56 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-06 9:43 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 0:27 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 10:15 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 11:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-05 11:51 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-05 21:19 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-03-05 21:42 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-05 21:46 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-03-06 9:19 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 1:08 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 9:45 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 0:41 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 9:15 ` benh
2002-03-06 11:07 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 11:12 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-03-06 11:59 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 12:02 ` Meelis Roos
2002-03-06 12:11 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-06 16:01 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-06 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-03-06 17:00 ` benh
2002-03-06 9:49 ` Martin Dalecki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-06 13:46 Ronnie Sahlberg
2002-03-13 15:55 Rick A. Hohensee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C84B1FB.2050003@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zwane@linux.realnet.co.sz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox