Re: [PATCH 2.4.19-pre2]

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>]

We don't need the silly spinlock wrappers in 2.4 either.....

> 
> + * Wrapper for disabling interrupts.
> + * (note : inline, so optimised away)
> + */
> +static inline void
> +wv_splhi(net_local *           lp,
> +        unsigned long *        pflags)
> +{
> +  spin_lock_irqsave(&lp->spinlock, *pflags);
> +  /* Note : above does the cli(); itself */
> +}
> +
> +/*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> +/*
> + * Wrapper for re-enabling interrupts.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +wv_splx(net_local *            lp,
> +       unsigned long *         pflags)
> +{
> +  spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->spinlock, *pflags);
> +
> +  /* Note : enabling interrupts on the hardware is done in wv_ru_start()
> +   * via : outb(OP1_INT_ENABLE, LCCR(base));
> +   */
> +}
> +

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Usenet Rule #2 (John Gilmore): "The Net interprets
Building 1024    | censorship as damage and routes around it."
MandrakeSoft     |