From: "Paul G. Allen" <pgallen@randomlogic.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@localhost.localdomain
Cc: "Linux kernel developer's mailing list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SSSCA: We're in trouble now
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 10:16:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C865CED.F16FAA0F@randomlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203061325360.2181-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On 5 Mar 2002, Trever L. Adams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 23:26, Petro wrote:
> > > Do what they tell you, or go to jail. (Well, there is a third
> > > choice, but it would best not be discussed here).
> >
> > And for the safety of those in the USA and around the world,
> > particularly on this list... it is best not to even think about it...
>
> Wasn't the second amendment created for this purpose ?
>
Exactly. Last I checked, I can still say and think what I want, but in
some cases it's the way you say it that matters. Your actions also have
bearing on your speach - just saying you're going to revolt is different
than saying it and then actually trying it.
I DO NOT have to do what they tell me, as the Constitution specifically
limits what they can tell me to do. Sure, they can try, they can even
break the law (as the SSSCA and DMCA do) and tell me to do it anyway,
and throw me in jail for not doing it.
The problem - and here I am repeating myself again - is that too many
people _allow_ themselves to be told what to do when what they are being
told is blatantly against the law. It comes down to the Fear Factor once
again, and THAT, I think, is the major driving force behind government
(or other) control.
The first reason the SSSCA will pass (if it does), and the reason the
DMCA did pass, is due to the fact that most people outside of the
technical "geek" community not only didn't (or don't) understand it, but
that they have never even heard of it. The second reason is because
those who do know and understand, kept (or keep) their mouths shut and
don't inform those who don't.
The third, at least in this country, is the piss poor voter
participation. Yesterday within 5 min. - the time it took me to go to
the polls, vote, and come home - I met no less than 5 people who freely
admitted to not voting and appearing to be proud of it. But that's
another issue altogether, and borders on OT.
PGA
--
Paul G. Allen
Owner, Sr. Engineer, Security Specialist
Random Logic/Dream Park
www.randomlogic.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-06 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-01 19:46 SSSCA: We're in trouble now Paul G. Allen
2002-03-01 20:27 ` Shawn Starr
2002-03-01 20:30 ` Xavier Bestel
2002-03-01 21:29 ` Shawn Starr
2002-03-01 22:19 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-02 3:08 ` Neale Banks
2002-03-02 3:03 ` eddantes
2002-03-02 18:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-01 22:47 ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-02 2:59 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-06 4:26 ` Petro
2002-03-06 4:41 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-03-06 16:26 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-06 17:03 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-03-06 18:16 ` Paul G. Allen [this message]
2002-03-06 18:35 ` Trever L. Adams
2002-03-07 22:54 ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-08 2:12 ` Tom Rauschenbach
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-02 0:21 Thomas Hood
2002-03-02 8:35 ` Florian Weimer
2002-03-02 17:34 ` M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
2002-03-04 8:30 ` Helge Hafting
2002-03-04 9:40 ` Martin Eriksson
2002-03-04 17:02 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-06 4:41 ` Petro
2002-03-06 9:27 ` Helge Hafting
2002-03-02 15:30 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-03-02 21:58 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-03 1:29 ` Greg Louis
2002-03-06 4:51 ` Petro
2002-03-02 17:47 ` Jurgen Botz
2002-03-06 5:00 ` Petro
2002-03-06 16:42 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-06 18:24 ` Paul G. Allen
2002-03-06 23:56 ` Petro
2002-03-04 19:27 Jesse Pollard
2002-03-06 17:20 Ed Vance
2002-03-06 18:31 ` Paul G. Allen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C865CED.F16FAA0F@randomlogic.com \
--to=pgallen@randomlogic.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox