From: "Jonathan A. George" <JGeorge@greshamstorage.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 17:51:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C87FD12.8060800@greshamstorage.com> (raw)
I am considering adding some enhancements to CVS to address deficiencies
which adversely affect my productivity. Since it would obviously be
nice to have a completely free (or even GPL :-) tool which is not
considered to consist of unacceptable compromises in the process of
kernel development I would like to know what the Bitkeeper users
consider the minimum acceptable set of improvements that CVS would
require for broader acceptance. Obviously the tremendous set of
features that Bitkeeper has are nice, but I'd like to narrow the
comparative flaws to a manageable set.
Any comments would benefit all of the free SCM projects by at least
helping to provide a guiding light.
--Jonathan--
next reply other threads:[~2002-03-07 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-07 23:51 Jonathan A. George [this message]
2002-03-07 23:59 ` Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters? Rik van Riel
2002-03-08 0:03 ` Cort Dougan
2002-03-09 11:17 ` Roman Zippel
2002-03-09 16:45 ` Kurt Roeckx
2002-03-08 0:26 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-08 0:36 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-08 1:48 ` Neil Brown
2002-03-10 20:27 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-11 21:11 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-12 16:31 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-08 7:37 ` Alex Riesen
2002-03-08 0:29 ` Jonathan A. George
2002-03-08 0:43 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-08 9:32 ` Pau Aliagas
2002-03-08 16:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-08 20:15 ` Pau Aliagas
2002-03-08 20:22 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-08 20:28 ` Pau Aliagas
2002-03-08 0:38 ` Erik Andersen
2002-03-08 9:38 ` Pau Aliagas
2002-03-09 1:52 ` Val Henson
2002-03-09 2:00 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-09 2:25 ` Dave Jones
2002-03-08 1:19 ` Dave Jones
2002-03-08 20:27 ` Jonathan A. George
2002-03-08 21:59 ` Eli
2002-03-08 3:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-03-08 9:39 ` Pau Aliagas
2002-03-11 17:05 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-11 17:12 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-03-11 17:25 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-11 17:53 ` Jonathan A. George
2002-03-11 18:03 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-11 20:36 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-11 21:01 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-11 21:28 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-10 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-09 22:22 Tom Lord
2002-03-11 17:10 ` Larry McVoy
2002-03-12 6:09 ` Tom Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C87FD12.8060800@greshamstorage.com \
--to=jgeorge@greshamstorage.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox