From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@fenrus.demon.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 10:14:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C8880EF.5030602@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200203080823.g288NC514338@fenrus.demon.nl> <3C8877D7.2020708@evision-ventures.com> <20020308085028.A14375@fenrus.demon.nl>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 09:35:35AM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
>
>>Please look closer at my posting. I just think, that since there
>>are apparently no tru hardware raid devices out there it would
>>be sufficient to expand the detection code to not ignore
>>RAID class devices at all. This would just prevent
>>us from having two different entries in the
>>device detection list. Not much more involved I think.
>>
>
> There's one tiny glitch: there are exactly 2 "real" raid devices out there
> (that I know of at least). But anyway, a "don't look at" list will be
> MUCH shorter than a "look also at" list.
Would you dare to tell me which those are? And are you sure
they don't expose themself as SCSI hosts to the system on PCI?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-08 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-07 9:01 [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch Hank Yang
2002-03-07 10:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-08 1:45 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-08 2:10 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 3:01 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-08 8:19 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-08 8:23 ` arjan
2002-03-08 8:35 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-08 8:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-08 9:14 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-03-08 13:12 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 19:25 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-03-09 13:25 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-08 13:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-13 7:35 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-13 7:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-08 2:54 ` Kelsey Hudson
2002-03-08 7:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-03-08 8:12 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-07 13:15 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-08 3:49 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-08 13:14 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-13 6:52 ` Hank Yang
2002-03-13 16:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 9:38 ` Hank Yang
[not found] ` <039701c20892$3940ca30$c0cca8c0@promise.com.tw>
2002-05-31 14:33 ` [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE " Alan Cox
2002-06-03 3:51 ` [PATCH] 2.4.19pre9 in pdc202xx.c bug Hank Yang
2002-06-03 15:48 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-06 2:31 ` Hank Yang
2002-06-06 12:17 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <3C876199.5000107@evision-ventures.com>
2002-03-08 2:00 ` [PATCH] Submitting PROMISE IDE Controllers Driver Patch Hank Yang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-10 14:23 Ed Tomlinson
2002-03-10 14:47 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-11 9:56 ` benh
[not found] <200203071331.g27DVi211087@sunrise.pg.gda.pl>
2002-03-07 13:36 ` Andrzej Krzysztofowicz
2002-03-07 6:46 Hank Yang
2002-03-09 21:23 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C8880EF.5030602@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=arjan@fenrus.demon.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox