Re: Kernel SCM: When does CVS fall down where it REALLY matters?

Rik van Riel
2002-03-08T20:24:23Z

On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Pau Aliagas wrote:
> >
> > > I'd recommend everybody to give arch a try.
> >
> > If you could setup a public arch repository of the 2.4 / 2.5
> > kernel of which everybody can copy/clone their arch kernel
> > repository, that would be a good start.
>
> It is not necessary to setup a central repository.
>
> We need a reference archive to keep in sync with; then everybody
> branches from there and syncs back and forth.

Exactly! Now, is there some arch fan willing to setup this
initial repository ?

> > That would give us some real way to compare the two tools.
>
> It seems obvious that bitkeeper is in very good shape; I'm not at all
> against people using, but I'm sure that if a few people tried arch,
> they'd be gratefully surprised.

Having an initial repository would get a lot of people
(including me, once I have a bit of time) to try out
arch.

regards,

Rik
--
<insert bitkeeper endorsement here>

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/