From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
To: Thomas Hood <jdthood@mail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PnP BIOS driver status
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 20:00:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C895E90.696E92A2@didntduck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1015628440.14518.212.camel@thanatos>
Thomas Hood wrote:
>
> A couple people have asked me about the status of the
> PnP BIOS driver, so I thought I'd post an update.
>
> History: During the pre-Tosatti 2.4-ac series the driver was
> hammered into a reliable form. However it never entered the
> mainline kernel series.
>
> The driver was then stripped down to the core functionality
> required to make the lspnp and setpnp utilities work.
> pnpbios_register_driver() and pnpbios_unregister_driver() are
> still there but aren't used by anything. Additional /proc/
> interface files were then added to allow reading of ESCD info.
>
> The latest version of the driver seems nice 'n' stable and can
> be found in Alan's latest 2.4 patches.
>
> Current 2.5 kernels also contain the driver, but it's a bit out
> of date. There's a patch in 2.5-dj but that's also out of date.
> ("Out of date" here means "missing new features and some
> cleanups".) Once DJ releases a 2.5.6-dj I'll send him a patch
> to bring his tree up to date. Then he can pass it on to Linus.
The current driver is not SMP-safe. It is modifying the GDT descriptors
outside of the pnp_bios_lock. Also, you can remove the __cli(), as
spin_lock_irq() already turns off interrupts.
--
Brian Gerst
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-09 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-08 23:00 PnP BIOS driver status Thomas Hood
2002-03-08 23:14 ` Dave Jones
2002-03-09 0:43 ` Thomas Hood
2002-03-09 1:00 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2002-03-09 1:10 ` Thomas Hood
2002-03-09 2:23 ` Brian Gerst
2002-03-09 3:02 ` Thomas Hood
2002-03-09 1:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-09 1:37 ` Brian Gerst
2002-03-09 2:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-09 1:51 ` Brian Gerst
2002-03-09 2:26 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-09 2:24 ` Thomas Hood
2002-03-09 2:48 ` Thomas Hood
2002-03-09 14:44 ` Thomas Hood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-09 15:11 Thomas Hood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C895E90.696E92A2@didntduck.org \
--to=bgerst@didntduck.org \
--cc=jdthood@mail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox