From: Jean-Eric Cuendet <jean-eric.cuendet@linkvest.com>
To: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UNIX bench better on 2.2 than 2.4?
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 11:44:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C91D0A3.4050500@linkvest.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C91A822.7030304@linkvest.com> <20020315053211.A5619@mark.mielke.cc>
>
>
>>Results:
>>Host1: 2xPIII 550MHz / 1Gb RAM / RAID5 SCSI / 2.4.6smp + LVM
>> Result: 164.7
>>Host2: 2xPIII 866MHz / 1Gb RAM / RAID1 soft IDE / 2.4.16smp + LVM
>> Result: 195.7
>>Host3: 1xPIII 800MHz / 512Mb RAM / IDE / 2.2.19 RedHat 6.2
>> Result: 208.6
>>Host4: 1xPIII 600MHz / 256Mb RAM / IDE / 2.4.19-pre2-ac4-preempt
>> Result: 153.6
>>
>
>I dunno what Unix bench is... but isn't 153.6/208.6 close to 600/800
>in terms of a fraction?
>
Yes, you are right for this one.
But what impressed me is between Host2/Host3. One is a dual-866 with
2.4.16 and the other is mono-800 with 2.2.19. And the host3 with 2.2.19
is ~7% better than Host2 (Not counting that Host3 has ~8% more CPU
clock, which should have be ~15% better for Host2 vs Host3...)
>Make Host3 or Host4 have both versions of the linux kernel in /boot
>and try each on the same machine.
>
But that's just what I'd like to see. How 2.4 compares vs 2.2
-jec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-15 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-15 7:52 UNIX bench better on 2.2 than 2.4? Jean-Eric Cuendet
2002-03-15 10:32 ` Mark Mielke
2002-03-15 10:44 ` Jean-Eric Cuendet [this message]
2002-03-15 10:56 ` Mark Mielke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-15 7:36 Jean-Eric Cuendet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C91D0A3.4050500@linkvest.com \
--to=jean-eric.cuendet@linkvest.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox