public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Samuel <samuel@bcgreen.com>
To: Andreas Ferber <aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
	torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] syscall interface for cpu affinity
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 14:06:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C92704C.1070909@bcgreen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1015784104.1261.8.camel@phantasy> <20020311013853.A1545@devcon.net>

Picking nits, but....

Andreas Ferber wrote:

 > Setting the affinity of a whole process group also makes sense IMHO.
 > Therefore I think an interface more like the setpriority syscall
 > for sched_set_affinity (with two parameters which/who instead of a
 > single PID) would be more flexible, eg.
 >
 >     int sched_set_affinity(int which, int who, unsigned int len,
 >                            unsigned long *new_mask_ptr);
 >
 > with who one of {PRIO_PROCESS,PRIO_PGRP,PRIO_USER} and which according
 > to the value of who.

I soule suggest that the order be

int sched_set_affinity(int who, int which, unsigned int len,
                             unsigned long *new_mask_ptr);

This would have the {p,pg}id be the first thing that a programmer
would see (likely more important than the 'which'.).


-- 
Stephen Samuel +1(604)876-0426                samuel@bcgreen.com
		   http://www.bcgreen.com/~samuel/
Powerful committed communication, reaching through fear, uncertainty and
doubt to touch the jewel within each person and bring it to life.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-15 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-10 18:15 [PATCH] syscall interface for cpu affinity Robert Love
2002-03-10 20:29 ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-03-10 20:53   ` Robert Love
2002-03-10 21:03     ` Andreas Jaeger
2002-03-10 22:23       ` Andreas Schwab
2002-03-10 23:56       ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-10 23:45     ` Jeff Garzik
1976-03-03 15:58       ` Tim Hockin
2002-03-11  0:08         ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-11  0:32           ` Tim Hockin
2002-03-10 22:05 ` Chris Wedgwood
2002-03-10 22:11   ` Robert Love
2002-03-11  0:38 ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-15 22:06   ` Stephen Samuel [this message]
2002-03-16  0:43     ` Andreas Ferber
2002-03-16  4:24       ` Stephen Samuel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3C92704C.1070909@bcgreen.com \
    --to=samuel@bcgreen.com \
    --cc=aferber@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox