From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
To: jt@hpl.hp.com
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] Micro-Second timers in kernel ?
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 18:42:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C92B126.852DC838@mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020315164845.A15889@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering what is the lowest resolution of timers that can
> be get in Linux across all platforms. The goal : I need to do
> microsecond resolution delay in the hard_xmit function of the IrDA-USB
> driver, and don't want to just grab the CPU.
>
> The function sys_nanosleep() seems to indicate that under 2ms,
> we should not even bother using a timer. Well, on a modern CPU, 2ms is
> a very long time (on the other hand, it seems OK for PDAs).
> The definition of "tick" in timer.c indicate that the timer_bh
> is called at a maximum of HZ time per second (which is consistent with
> the definition of jiffies). On i386, this would be one tick every
> 10ms.
> Well... I'm stuck. 10ms is a very long time at 4Mb/s. So, I
> guess I'll continue to busy wait before sending each packet. Ugh !
>
The overhead to do a timer is on the order of at least 100 us on an
800MHZ machine. Given this, a timer/ interrupt based delay for less
than 100 us is probably a bad idea.
Still, times in this range and up are available in the high-res-timers
patch, BUT, while the patch makes a stab at providing POSIX timers for
all "arch"s the high-res part depends on the hardware and thus is
different for each platform. Even for the x86 there are two versions
(three if you want to work with a machine that does not have a TSC).
The upshot of this is that high-res timers will be available on some
platforms soon but it will take some time to find them on all platforms.
That said, there are a few kernel issues that need to be ironed out.
Here are a couple:
1.) What interface(s) would you like to see in the kernel.
2.) Is there a standard compliant way to extend high-res to the user
APIs that currently, implicitly reference CLOCK_REALTIME. The issue
here is:
CLOCK_REALTIME is rather firmly locked on to 1/HZ resolution.
The select() API (to give just one example) does not specify a CLOCK and
so implicitly uses CLOCK_REALTIME.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
George george@mvista.com
High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-16 3:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-16 0:48 [QUESTION] Micro-Second timers in kernel ? Jean Tourrilhes
2002-03-16 2:42 ` george anzinger [this message]
2002-03-20 20:44 ` Kasper Dupont
2002-03-29 9:24 ` george anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C92B126.852DC838@mvista.com \
--to=george@mvista.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox