From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 22:35:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 22:35:27 -0500 Received: from [211.238.181.68] ([211.238.181.68]:59661 "EHLO mail.digitaldreamstudios.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 22:35:18 -0500 Message-ID: <3C96B1FB.BFE2C122@nownuri.net> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 12:35:23 +0900 From: SeongTae Yoo X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Urban Widmark CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: file listing problem in smbfs, kernel 2.4.18 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Urban Widmark wrote: > > You could also try the smbfs unicode patch for 2.4.18, and see if that > changes anything. > http://www.hojdpunkten.ac.se/054/samba/index.html > (Note the additional samba patch and mount flags needed) I tried it just before, but same result. > > Do you have trouble with this set of files elsewhere? > > If you have more than one server, does it make any difference if you copy > the files to some other server? I have already tested before the previous posting, but no difference. However, when the files are copied to a fat32 partition of w2k server, all files listed. > Does it matter how deep in the file hierarchy the dir is, for example is > there any difference between these two: > //server/share/some/long/path/the-dir-that-fails/ > //server/share/the-dir-that-fails/ The original depth is //server/e$/1st-dir/2nd-dir/3rd-dir/ tested depths are //server/e$/2nd-dir/3rd-dir/ or //server/e$/3rd-dir/ but no difference. If you need some other tests, I will do it.