From: Andreas Hartmann <andihartmann@freenet.de>
To: Thunder from the hill <thunder@ngforever.de>
Cc: Kernel-Mailingliste <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.4.18] Security: Process-Killer if machine get's out of memory
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 23:23:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C9E51FC.8030503@freenet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0203241029000.18660-100000@imladris.surriel.com> <3C9DDDEE.3000401@athlon.maya.org> <3C9E48B8.9080707@ngforever.de>
Thunder from the hill wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Maybe, it would be possible to sort all known processes by there
>> memory usage and combine it with the speed of their memoryrequests.
>> If memory gets low, and there is a process, which suddenly requests a
>> lot of memory, this process get's killed, even if there is another
>> process, which has three times more memory allocated then the "fast
>> growing" process. If all processes are growing nearly equal and memory
>> gets low, the process with the most memory usage get's killed -
>> because with this process, the kernel achieves the target (to get free
>> memspace) best.
>
> So what if I want to malloc() say 100 MiBs at once? I'll get into
> trouble then, because if I don't malloc() with sleep()s I get killed.
> That's perfect performance then.
Only if there's not enough free memory. You can't get more memory then
the machine has.
The mechanism gets active only when there isn't enough free memory for
your request.
Regards,
Andreas Hartmann
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-24 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-24 12:09 [2.4.18] Security: Process-Killer if machine get's out of memory andreas
[not found] ` <3C9DC6D0.3080606@wanadoo.fr>
2002-03-24 13:24 ` Andreas Hartmann
[not found] ` <3C9DD653.8090701@wanadoo.fr>
2002-03-24 13:36 ` Andreas Hartmann
2002-03-24 13:30 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-24 14:08 ` Andreas Hartmann
2002-03-24 16:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 16:59 ` Andreas Hartmann
[not found] ` <3C9E48B8.9080707@ngforever.de>
2002-03-24 22:23 ` Andreas Hartmann [this message]
2002-03-24 15:58 ` Chris Swiedler
2002-03-24 16:57 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 16:59 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2002-03-24 17:45 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-24 17:57 ` Christian Bornträger
2002-03-24 18:01 ` Rik van Riel
2002-03-24 18:03 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2002-03-24 18:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 18:37 ` Andreas Hartmann
2002-03-24 18:20 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 19:20 ` Itai Nahshon
2002-03-24 17:24 ` Andreas Hartmann
2002-03-24 18:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 18:23 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-03-24 19:49 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 19:48 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-03-24 20:39 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 18:32 ` Andreas Hartmann
2002-03-24 19:50 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-24 20:43 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-03-25 15:09 ` Rok Papež
2002-03-26 20:24 ` dean gaudet
2002-03-26 23:47 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C9E51FC.8030503@freenet.de \
--to=andihartmann@freenet.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thunder@ngforever.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox