From: Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
Cc: vojtech@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.7 pre-UDMA PIIX bug
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:00:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CA47378.70208@evision-ventures.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200203291239.NAA25704@harpo.it.uu.se>
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Vojtech's version of drivers/ide/piix.c which went into 2.5.7
> oopses with a divide-by-zero exception when initialising older
> pre-UDMA chips, like in the following 430HX chipset:
>
> 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II] (rev 03)
> 00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 01)
> 00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II]
> (PCI IDs 8086:1250, 8086:7000, and 8086:7010, respectively)
>
> The error occurs in piix.c:piix_set_drive() line 334, shown below.
> The 82371SB has PIIX_UDMA_NONE in the piix_ide_chips[] array,
> so piix_config->flags & PIIX_UDMA is zero, which makes "umul" zero,
> which causes the divide-by-zero on line 334.
>
> 317 static int piix_set_drive(ide_drive_t *drive, unsigned char speed)
> 318 {
> 319 ide_drive_t *peer = HWIF(drive)->drives + (~drive->dn & 1);
> 320 struct ata_timing t, p;
> 321 int err, T, UT, umul;
> 322
> 323 if (speed != XFER_PIO_SLOW && speed != drive->current_speed)
> 324 if ((err = ide_config_drive_speed(drive, speed)))
> 325 return err;
> 326
> 327 umul = min((speed > XFER_UDMA_4) ? 4 : ((speed > XFER_UDMA_2) ? 2 : 1),
> 328 piix_config->flags & PIIX_UDMA);
> 329
> 330 if (piix_config->flags & PIIX_VICTORY)
> 331 umul = 2;
> 332
> 333 T = 1000000000 / piix_clock;
> 334 UT = T / umul;
I think that it should be just sufficient to add the
following test just in front of the offending calculartion.
if (umul == 0)
++umul;
Vojtech is this right?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-29 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-29 12:39 2.5.7 pre-UDMA PIIX bug Mikael Pettersson
2002-03-29 14:00 ` Martin Dalecki [this message]
2002-03-29 15:09 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-03-29 15:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-03-30 14:26 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-03-29 15:08 ` Vojtech Pavlik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-29 18:20 Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CA47378.70208@evision-ventures.com \
--to=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=vojtech@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox