public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.8-pre2
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 03:50:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CB0246D.23CED3C6@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204051657270.16281-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0204071215220.2567-100000@lisianthus.sonytel.be> <20020407112716.A30048@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

Russell King wrote:
> 
> (Oh, and a bugbear - people go running around adding checks for the
> return value of request_region and friends on embedded devices where
> there can't be the possibility of a clash waste memory needlessly.)

If you do:

#define request_region(start, n, name)
	({
		__request_region(start, n, name);
		(struct resource *)1;
	})
#define release_region(start, n) do { } while (0)

then the compiler will remove all those error checks for you,
as well as the release_region calls.

Of course if you actually want to use the innards of the
returned resource * then that's not so good.

However, you can make it:

#define request_region()                                \
        ({                                              \
                struct resource *r;                     \
                r = __request_region();                 \
                (struct resource *)((long)r | 1);       \
        })

and, amazingly, the compiler still knows that the value
is non-zero, and still will elide those tests.  You'll
need to mask that bit off again to use the pointer.

Whether you'll stoop this low depends upon how much you
want those bytes back :)

-

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-04-07 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-04-06  1:01 Linux 2.5.8-pre2 Linus Torvalds
2002-04-06  6:59 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-07 10:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-07 10:27   ` Russell King
2002-04-07 10:42     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-07 10:56       ` Russell King
2002-04-07 13:34       ` Russell King
2002-04-07 14:51         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-07 10:50     ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-04-09  8:05 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre2 IDE 29b Martin Dalecki
2002-04-10 13:14 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 30 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-10 13:16 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 31 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-11 13:42 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 32 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-14 13:55   ` [PATCH] 2.5.8-pre3 IDE 33 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-15 13:45 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 35 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16  7:05 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16  8:30   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16  7:33     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16  8:43       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16  9:19       ` David Lang
2002-04-16  8:43         ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 14:14           ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-16 13:49             ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 15:24               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16 15:46                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:15                   ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 16:01                     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:25                       ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 16:33                       ` Padraig Brady
2002-04-16 17:42                       ` Andreas Dilger
2002-04-16 17:00                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-16 17:04                 ` David Lang
2002-04-16 17:00                   ` David S. Miller
2002-04-16 17:09                     ` David Lang
2002-04-16 17:06                       ` David S. Miller
2002-04-16 17:16                         ` David Lang
2002-04-17  7:44                           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17  9:33                             ` David Lang
2002-04-16 17:40                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-04-17  7:46                           ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17  9:26                             ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-04-17  9:39                             ` David Lang
2002-04-17 20:58                             ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-17  9:13                           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-17  1:55                             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-04-17  8:39                               ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17  8:25                         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-04-16 15:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 15:58               ` Richard Gooch
2002-04-16 16:06                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-17  7:38                   ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16 15:30         ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:05           ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 15:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-16 16:23               ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 17:06                 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-04-18 20:33               ` eNBD on loopback [was Re: [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36] Pavel Machek
2002-04-18 20:39                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-04-18 10:45                   ` regarding NFS Jehanzeb Hameed
2002-04-19  9:36                     ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-19  1:19                       ` Jehanzeb Hameed
2002-04-19 12:24                         ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-19  2:26                           ` Jehanzeb Hameed
2002-04-19 13:46                             ` Trond Myklebust
2002-04-17  7:36             ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 36 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-17  9:24               ` Alan Cox
2002-04-16 22:46   ` Brian Gerst
2002-04-17  7:52     ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-16  9:22 ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 37 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18  9:14   ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 38 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18 10:48     ` Russell King
2002-04-18  9:54       ` Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18  9:16   ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 37 Martin Dalecki
2002-04-18  9:22     ` [PATCH] 2.5.8 IDE 39 Martin Dalecki
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204051657270.16281-100000@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-08  7:29 ` Linux 2.5.8-pre2 Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3CB0246D.23CED3C6@zip.com.au \
    --to=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox