From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 16:51:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CB05CF8.4513BA83@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28682.1018189712@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au>
Hi,
Keith Owens wrote:
> >These 14 seconds (or 37 seconds on my machine) are always needed
> >whatever I try, e.g. "make foo/bar.o" also needs that time.
>
> make NO_MAKEFILE_GEN=1 foo/bar.o. Very low overhead for quick and
> dirty testing of changes, but if you want an accurate kernel build, you
> have to take the overhead. kbuild 2.4 overhead for a full build when
> only minor changes have been made is even worse.
I don't want a kernel build, I just want a single object file to be
rebuilt?!
I can understand that it takes longer, when I change a Makefile or the
config, but why has the Makefile to be rebuilt, when only a source file
changed?
bye, Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-07 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-05 11:26 Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, Release 2.0 is available Keith Owens
2002-04-06 2:03 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-06 16:35 ` Russell King
2002-04-06 23:12 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-06 18:17 ` Larry McVoy
2002-04-07 14:18 ` Roman Zippel
2002-04-07 14:28 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-07 14:51 ` Roman Zippel [this message]
2002-04-07 14:53 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-07 15:38 ` Roman Zippel
2002-04-07 23:35 ` [kbuild-devel] " Brendan J Simon
2002-04-08 8:50 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-08 9:06 ` Roman Zippel
2002-04-08 12:04 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-09 13:08 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-09 19:00 ` [kbuild-devel] " Thomas Duffy
2002-04-10 1:11 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-10 11:48 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-14 13:23 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-16 1:58 ` Keith Owens
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-06 7:20 Keith Owens
2002-04-07 0:51 ` Keith Owens
[not found] <p73k7rms6ba.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <7853.1018011163@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-05 14:37 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-05 14:52 ` Keith Owens
[not found] <7022.1018005968@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-04-05 12:01 ` Andi Kleen
2002-04-05 12:52 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-05 13:29 ` Russell King
2002-04-05 14:33 ` Keith Owens
2002-04-05 10:59 Keith Owens
2002-04-05 11:09 ` Pavel Machek
2002-04-05 11:23 ` Sebastian Heidl
2002-04-05 18:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-04-06 18:31 ` Peter Samuelson
2002-04-08 16:16 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CB05CF8.4513BA83@linux-m68k.org \
--to=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox